MojoComics

To be honest, the only thing I've seen her in is John Wick 2, so her accent wasn't an issue.

As far as I know just a solid story. On a side note, anyone anticipate movement on New Avengers #11, first Ronin?

Yeah, there are a LOT of instances where they use Miguel O'Hara and Spider-Man 2099 as examples. Seems like they thought that would be the way that SPE would take things if they decided to go the alternate Spider-Man route.

Again, from the addendum: "RIGHTS: SPE has the exclusive right to utilize the “Spider-Man” character and the other Creative Elements listed in Paragraph 1 above to (a) develop and produce live action or animated theatrical motion pictures (each, a “Picture”) and live-action television series (and also animated television series with episodes longer than 44 minutes), during the Production Term, and (b) distribute, advertise and otherwise exploit in perpetuity any motion picture or television series that commenced production during the Production Term."

Sounds like you concede that it's contractually possible, just improbable. In that case I agree with you.

https://wikileaks.org/sony/docs/07/junderwood/1 Corp Dev/Spiderman/Executive Summary of All Deal Points/Executive Summary (Creative).pdf Edit: I guess my post was incorrect as far as stating the 'original' contract, as this is, at least according to the Wikileaks source that started this whole thing, the summary of the most current addendum.

Again, if you look at the original contract, Schedule 3 names Miles Morales BY NAME, Schedule IV states that Spider-Man/Miles Morales can be used as an alternate named Spider-Man costume, and Schedule VI names Spider-Man III (Miles Morales) as a 'Named Character' that SPE is authorized to use in their production. I don't know how much more cut-and-dry that can be. Now, whether that's a good idea, whether it happens or not, or whether it should, all that is irrelevant. I actually don't think it'll happen, and I don't think it'll be successful if it does. However, the contract is what matters, and it's there in black-and-white that by the terms of the original agreement, SPE is contractually allowed to. As for Stan Lee's interview, while I always like hearing his thoughts about Marvel's processes, is an opinion piece at best, and as one of the co-creators it's obvious that he'd want the character to remain as true to his original vision as possible.

From the original contract: " Alternate Versions Of Spider-Man Character . If SPE depicts an alternative version of Spider-Man (i.e., not Peter Parker), then: SPE must use the alternative version’s civilian alter ego" This seems to indicate that Spider-Man does not always have to be Peter Parker...

Do you have an additional source that I'm not privy to, or is my Google-fu failing me, because I'm not seeing where it stipulates that only Peter Parker can be Spider-Man anywhere in the contractual sources that I'm able to find.

I believe you're reading that contract incorrectly. There are two different lists of character traits that Sony must abide by, one for Spider-Man (whether Peter Parker or an alternative Spider-Man character), and one for Peter Parker, and it doesn't stipulate that "Spider-Man" has to be caucasian, only that "Peter Parker or *his* Spider-Man alter ego" has to be caucasian.

Yeah, I just dug one out of a box yesterday that I'd forgotten about and have been trying to price it, but it's all over the place.

Breaking news from 2 weeks ago! Do you still get your porn delivered in a brown paper wrapper too? Post dates are important...

Don't know if this is old news or not, but anything Deathstroke is about to explode; New Teen Titans #2 is already going for ~$200.00 more than it was last week due to confirmed appearance as the main villain in the new Batman solo movie.

Looks like some interest after Marvel declared her the 'smartest person in the Marvel Universe' at SDCC. :shrug:

Agreed, but Pulse 11/13 is hardly 'big money', and may be worth the gamble. This is, after all, a 'pre-heat' thread.