• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Maccai3

Member
  • Posts

    2,517
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • Location
    Manchester, UK

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. ooh i'm beating Bosco to some info here, someone on reddit claims to have found were they are filming Arkham scenes has the sign up too, it's on Staten Island
  2. Didn't Marvel move Cap 3 directly on the same date as Superman vs Batman in the first place?? So that was a strong play by Marvel, and it worked in Warner backing down. I expect Marvel to the same thing on any of these new dates that Warner just announced. If Marvel wants the date ...you better move it. It's funny to see Marvel and DC continue their rivalry, yet now cinematically. how is trying to make as much money as possible backing down? Cap 3 would have also made less money aswell, this is just the smart business move
  3. How is Guardians's results what made DC/Warner move its date? This date change had to be done by either company, which a few detailed analysts clearly called out as the right move for both studios to benefit. Take the Marvel blinders off, and see reality. Plain and simple. WB got scared. Fearful that it would lose money competing with Captain America 3. There is no way that this announcement today is a coincidence and not a direct correlation with the success of the GOTG movie. Ask yourself this. Why didn't WB announce this a SDCC when it had the attention of the international media. you are deluded IF they were worried about being outgrossed (which likely wont happen) then the success of CA:TWS would surely be enough to convince them that a date change is necessary this is a film that is already a fair way into production, they could be way ahead of schedule
  4. i wonder why they went for a 3D rendering instead of actual footage?
  5. i think it's more that it is hinting at a certain costume from a certain storyline
  6. Batman is generally billed as 6'2", Sperman 6'3" (i've seen 6'4" too) Affleck is arond 6'2"/3" Cavill is 6'1" maybe a reason for the shorter ears so Affleck doesn't look too tall
  7. There is so much wrong with this I don't even know where to begin. 1. Knee high metal plates to cover her skinny legs. 2. High heels to make her look taller 3. Not even a hint of red, white or blue. If I was American I would be insulted. 4. Upside down tiara or head band 5. Her top made to look she has a bigger breast size. etc...... Xena the Warrior Princess had a better outfit. these seem to be observations more than faults in the costume it's pretty clear by now that they were never going to go bright and colourful i have zero problems with the costume, you can tell who it is so it has fulfilled it's purpose
  8. Is this official or fan-made? Peace, Chip official, Zach Snyder released it
  9. it's yiddish for the "S" word