Jim M

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


About Jim M

  • Boards Title

Recent Profile Visitors

653 profile views
  1. Tree point five to 4.0, and a press would probably solidify the latter or if you are lucky a 4.5.
  2. Being motivated enough to start a business and create a website for it but so lazy as to not upload your own images to it are making my mind explode. The only explanation I can think of that makes any sense is that they don't press books at all and were going to take all of the submissions and run.
  3. I couldn't agree more. There is nothing better than having that art in hand for the first time. Seeing the details and inks is just so much better in person.
  4. Ah, I see you are on the same: "Lets pad our stats by 5 working days" plan that I am on
  5. Nobody is hoarding a nice raw copy?
  6. My first instinct was to agree with the first comment: But I at least get where it kind of puts them in a pickle. It has portions of the original cover that would otherwise be loose without being attached to the repro cover. Typically if the front cover is missing and the back is intact the book could get a .5 so I am guessing because it has portions of the actual cover it got the .5? A repro cover though with pieces of the real cover presumably glued on seems like poor restoration though, so I don't get why it is universal. Did I just talk myself back into?:
  7. I'm in between a 5.5 and 6.0. could go either way imo.
  8. I am looking for a high grade raw copy of Giant-Size X-Men 1. I prefer nice page quality in at least VF. Let me know if you have a copy that fits the bill.
  9. While my copy is not for sale, I just had to post this because I too am very picky about centering. I have a very nicely centered copy, and the CGC put it in the slab like this and it drives me CRAZY! Your post reminded me of it