While anything is possible, the cover artist for #4 (Joe Buresch) was a poor draftsman - some of his interior work is quite abysmal.
Thanks Damon.
So, what Sacentaur is saying is that for once the cover of this Centaur reflects the poopy art inside Yes, I have seen Buresch's art and aside from the occasional good panel here and there in the rare case where he uses a more fussy style where there are in the end too many lines, his work is nowhere near professional. Still, the resemblance to Roy Crane on that cover is not accidental as the example posted by Damonwad indicates.
Here's some more Crane. Wonder if Buresch used this for inspiration to draw women - 1934 could be harsh in its views ...
Interesting. It hadn't occurred to me that he might be aping Crane.
The depth of knowledge of you guys never ceases to amaze me!!