hhwolfman

I'm young again! I I consider anybody under the age of 30 young. If you are not, Your debate logic was that of my daughter that is under the age of 30. Just what I had to gauge it on. Sorry if I was wrong. Well more than twice wrong if you are gauging 30. You don't get what the PL/HOS criteria is. Substantiation is needed. Accusations of personality disorder are irrelevant. If they were relevant the HOS list would be huge. So over the age of 60 and still no logic. Pity. I've made a good friend this night! I have no ill will toward you at all. Hell, we might drink a beer together in the future, but if your debate is, but the rules? It is not logical. Night.

I'm young again! I I consider anybody under the age of 30 young. If you are not, Your debate logic was that of my daughter that is under the age of 30. Just what I had to gauge it on. Sorry if I was wrong. Well more than twice wrong if you are gauging 30. You don't get what the PL/HOS criteria is. Substantiation is needed. Accusations of personality disorder are irrelevant. If they were relevant the HOS list would be huge. So over the age of 60 and still no logic. Pity.

I'm young again! I I consider anybody under the age of 30 young. If you are not, Your debate logic was that of my daughter that is under the age of 30. Just what I had to gauge it on. Sorry if I was wrong.

(thumbs u

Night Jimmy Linguini, and jsilverjanet. You do have a good debate With some comical aspect going on. PovertyRow you have no idea what logic is. You must be very young with no concept. My daughter which is 28 years old is the most book smart person I know, but has no street smarts or logic. She is not doing very well. Peace and I hope nobody gets burned by the Hustrucker, in the future.

I give up All the 130 that voted him in to HOS and me. All have different Logic as to why they voted him in. The other 18 that voted no were right and had the same logic. The most absurd debate, I have ever been in. You win. Happy.

So logic can be voiced in a poll? I retract my lawyer comment. I think you are a psychic. You seem to know the minds of 100+ people, that majority of which have not uttered a peep beyond the poll. They voted, out of what they have read, of his many dealings by many board members, to put him on HOS. All which have seem to have problems. It is just logical.Yes Logic can be voiced in a poll. Just not explained. I am sure if you asked each one that polled. They would have the same logic.

Is this an official 'List'? Now Now there are 13 more out of 150 votes that believe that he does not warrant HOS. We must be fair.

I can not debate logic with someone that is illogical. HHWolfman 2015.

I assume you are a lawyer, perhaps a prosecutor? Yet your arguments seem based on opinion. "Majority can see what has gone on, with logic." How can you speak for what is an unspoken majority that appeared in a poll but nowhere else? How do you know with such assurance what their logic is if they never voiced it? In my previous post. I stated I was not a lawyer. That I had been involved in litigation for the last 2 years. Logic is in the eye of the beholder . " How do you know with such assurance what their logic is if they never voiced it?" Because they just voiced it in that poll. Good grief.

Here is the logical vote by the people. At last vote, 130 - yes 18 - no If someone wants to write up a better, more thorough and appropriate write up with HOS nomination worthy information, go for it. \(thumbs u Majority can see what has gone on, with logic. The other 18 are people go by technicalities of the rules. Which is just like our Justice system and criminals walk every day. Welcome to the real world.

The shilling was not proven, not admitted to. One thing that rubs my rhubarb is when people say "I am fairly positive" or similar (like "I think" or "I am pretty sure" etc. Would you like to be accused and convicted of something because another person was "fairly positive" or "thought" or was "pretty sure" you did something? I have seen this kind of "testimony" many times here, and more often than not it turns out to be either false or about someone else. This is why substantiated evidence as in posts, PMs etc. are asked for. This is just like a drug user. Problems keep arising, all the time and he keeps blaming something or someone else. I have been in court for over 18 months where the Judges keep using the same lack of evidence you just announced. Everyone in the court except for the judge knows what is going on. Witnesses have seen the proof first hand but the Judge still uses your same responses. Something drastic hast to happen and then it is to late. Thing is we have our own set of rules here. We require some form of substantiating real evidence, not conjecture. I am not defending anyone. I am defending the process. Yes, you can say I am doing the same thing: citing a lack of evidence. But if, as you say, witnesses have seen the proof first hand then that would come up here. Thing about these boards, there is little one on one talk. The vast, vast majority of communication is via PM, email, etc. All of which are easily reproduced. PS - if you are a lawyer you should know the difference between "to late" and "too late". (sorry about that last little dig.) I type a hundred words a minute with twenty mistakes. I am bad about proof reading. My friend TricolorBrian, a writer, always get's pissed at me. I just really don't care. No lawyer. Just someone who has gone through much litigation trying to get custody of my Grand Kids. Which is happening in the next 6 months. Going through so called rules. With no logic involved just rules. A piece of poop is a piece of poop. No matter what the rules or how much you defend it.

The shilling was not proven, not admitted to. One thing that rubs my rhubarb is when people say "I am fairly positive" or similar (like "I think" or "I am pretty sure" etc. Would you like to be accused and convicted of something because another person was "fairly positive" or "thought" or was "pretty sure" you did something? I have seen this kind of "testimony" many times here, and more often than not it turns out to be either false or about someone else. This is why substantiated evidence as in posts, PMs etc. are asked for. This is just like a drug user. Problems keep arising, all the time and he keeps blaming something or someone else. I have been in court for over 18 months where the Judges keep using the same lack of evidence you just announced. Everyone in the court except for the judge knows what is going on. Witnesses have seen the proof first hand but the Judge still uses your same responses. Something drastic hast to happen and then it is to late.

True words won't be said in this thread. I didn't proof read my statement be. I meant to say truer. It is the forbidden hops I believe.

I realize I am a noob. My thoughts don't count.I read all the threads posted on Hus. I taken notes on all the discussion here. Studied all the HOS rules. I am not a very serious person and posted a couple posts that aren't very serious. Just to make lite of the subject. The whole thing boils down to, it really doesn't matter if he is on Probation or HOS, he still is a person_who_is_obnoxiously_self-impressed canoe.

You have a lot to learn about message board drama I just want to read something interesting about comics. Let people form their own opinion about someone "snake-oiling" sales, pressing books and selling them undisclosed or deciding who they like the most between a two dudes tied amongst a bitter nerd-fight. I like a good nerd fight.

Tell Jim to give me a shout if he is still looking to unload some When I was looking at Jim's Hall , I saw Jumbo, Fights ,Wings Also some other oddball stuff. I think All the Schomberg titles were gone and he didn't get any superhero. Bob would know better than I.

Well keep . Maybe more will show up.

I have had hundreds of these over the past 30 years. I think the most I have had at one time was around 30. I sold the last couple I had a couple months ago. A friend of mine, Had over a hundred at one time. He has been selling them off the past couple years. Most were 9.2 to 9.6's. I don't know how many he has left I have had only 2 of the 35 centers non reprint. Now if Rom #1's Become Hot I am in business.

So, you bought these after Ed Had already been there? I always wondered why Ed Didn't take everything. Does this guy still have anything? I know Jim bought some after you did..

Yeah tis true. You purchased a few Goldens from me over the year. Welcome to the Board.

Hey Bob, This is Howard. Randy's friend that he sold some of that Rose Bowl comics to Cheap, to. Randy did always Brag about your collection. It is great to see photos of it. I had no idea it was so amazing.

It's for the Kids.

I wish I was good a photo shop. Feel free. Hustucker Proxy.