snizzenfixit

What is this? What's My Line? That is not an answer, as such I will go with the assumption that you are in fact notch top. This answers some questions. From what I have gathered in past threads, notch top and Meth have a history (not relating to book doctoring). This was not a storybook history either. This would be reason aplenty to continue a crusade against Meth. I have said in the past and I will say again, I have no knowledge as to Meths selling practices, but that is not what this is about. It is about wahoo turning every thread into an attack Meth thread. Well guess what wahoo, we are sick of it, we don't want to hear it any more. That is not what the forums are here for. You made your opinions clear a few thousand times, now lets move on. I do not want to pick you apart, but if you insist on continuing this attack Meth game then someone needs to play the attack wahoo game to keep some balance. Phil

What is it about not understanding when a person states a fact, as can be viewed throughout many of the threads in these forume, THAT YOU DONT UNDERSTAND????? Are you notch top? You dont know me, nor do you know much of my actions in real life, and the Venom I spew just may be the truth you and others hide from, but then again, that is JUST an OPINION, one of which may just be based on more credible evidence than yours. I don't need to know you, I only need to know what you post in order to respond to what you post. You rail on and on about evidence, but when this topic was active there was ample opportunity to submit that evidence and you failed to do so. The mask is off, people have formed opinions about you, just as you have formed an opinion about Meth. I am not alone in thinking that you have a hidden agenda here. Do not advise me on anything, I will post, and advise as I see fit. Take that advice or don't, that is up to you, but don't think that you can tell me what to post. that it also a reality in which I will further no more in this thread. This one is a real puzzler. No matter how many times I read it I still have no idea what you are talking about here. Anyone who can decipher this pearl of wisdom, please jump in and enlighten me. Phil

You know that last post of yours made absolutely no sense to me. . I didn't get it either, but he sure was on a roll Phil

Then you are quite narrow-minded, as you do NOT know the FULL credibility of ANY messenger on these boards. Right, with FULL being the operative word. I have formed an opinion on your credibility on this subject however. Your opinion is tainted, which is obvious in the venom you spew. If I say the sky is blue, it has less credence than if someone else said it. Nope, but if you said Meth's house was blue I would believe others over you. If you have been reading correctly, such as others here who do NOT read things correctly. They remember what they want pertaining to a (deleted) discussion That discussion was deleted for a reason, remember? I think you would be well advised to steer clear of the topic. and people will always remember what they want to remember, that is reality. Phil

Maybe it should be the MESSAGE you should FOCUS on instead of your perceptions concerning the messenger. We decide how much weight to give a message, based on the credibility of the messenger. Phil

My post/ reply is JUST to point this out, as if nobody already knew it I think you are the LAST person who should be crusading for Meth's removal. Your opinion of him has been made clear, so I think it is unlikely that you would be impartial. Phil

I saw the original listing, there was nothing slanderous about it. It's just you making a big deal out of it, Supa just wrote his opinion, that's all. Mmm, I saw the original listing too. I am not taking anyones side here, at all, but you definitely are wrong when you say he just wrote his opinion. Read all about him and his practices in my posts on the CGC forum That is not stating something as opinion, it is stating it as fact. I have no idea if it is enough for a lawsuit or not, but it is unfortunate that this whole mess has degenerated this far. Phil

Hehe, he has some Red Sonjas I was looking at, I looked at his other auctions (and he has a LOT of other auctions) I saw the title for this and the words "Darth and Greggy" flashed before my eyes. Phil

Here is an auction with Darth and Greggy's names written all over it Phil

the Steiner bros, and a few more big time wrestlers go to my gym. Hey, I went to school with those boys. Didn't know them very well though. Where they living now? California probably huh? Phil

We were ignoring him hoping he would go away Phil

Darth; Answer your PM Phil

Scottish - on a side note and in a feeble attempt to hijack this thread Ahem, yes ... It seems you have indeed hijacked this thread. A pox on you Diesel, I shall exact my revenge. Phil

I am willing to accept that it does happen if you are willing to accept that this is not always the case, and that it can go the other way too... It can ALWAYS go the other way. insufficiently_thoughtful_persons can leave Neg feedback anytime. Regardless of whether you wait or not. The only way to prevent it is to leave your feedback only after the other party leaves theirs. This would be just another form of feedback hostage. The seller should leave their feedback first ... Period. It should be left upon reciept of payment ... Period. If a seller does not leave feedback for me within whatever I consider a reasonable time, then I will not leave feedback for them ... Ever. If a seller does not leave feedback for me in what I consider a reasonable time, I will not bid on future auctions from that seller ... Period. I realize that this somewhat limits my purchasing power over time, but I don't really care. The principle is more important to me. Phil

I have to disagree. That is fine, I have not and will not change my mind. Don't think for one minute that sellers do not hold feedback hostage. Phil