• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

frank_newman

Member
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Still getting this: So I have to go back to the list of my bids and refresh to see if my bid is now high or not. Just imagine if this site had customers who had actual standards of quality. I guess there is some romance in bidding in a Haitian bazaar.
  2. Agreed on Collector's. I hope this experience leads people to them, I think they put a lot of work into producing a modern auction experience. There are still some issues with the flow of their interface, but I have bought a handful of books from them in these auctions and I have been happy with their communication and service.
  3. Put in a bid for the first time since the downtime and got this: God bless.
  4. Not a mention on the home screen or I think anywhere of the downtime and its possible impacts, just business as usual, just "We are the ONLY firm...". A class act. That doesn't mean I won't bid, but I sure as heck won't consign.
  5. The selling issue is serious. Recently Heritage froze for about a half-hour, and then just started up again. I would guess a portion of bidders gave up and didn't come back. Anyone selling after the freeze has a good case that Heritage's IT issue cost them money. In the past I have seen ComicLink auctions hang up for awhile, then just be restarted with no explanation. Again, if I had been a seller I would have felt that ComicLink's IT issue cost me money. ComicConnect has had issues too (it has been a few years since I have noticed such problems with either ComicLink or ComicConnect), but in that/those cases ComicConnect has stopped the auction and made a point to indicate that it would need to be started afresh the next night. While no IT failure is a positive for sellers, I think that ComicConnect's approach is about the best you can do. Luckily (I guess) the ComicLink was down before the Tuesday round kicked off, so they will be forced to start afresh. For the sake of the sellers they should send a comforting email to all bidders and prospective bidders explaining what happened and why the issue(s) is/are solved.
  6. They should have issued a statement within minutes of going down. Their competitors must be happy to see their lack of professionalism.
  7. Thanks DavidTheDavid for renewing this topic. I thought everybody had just given up. I have been too lazy to try GoCollect but I will get there. At this point I am not only unhappy about everything that was done last month, but now I am unhappy about a) no apology to users for implementing unwanted changes, which clearly many users find to be in the wrong direction, and b) no sign that there is work being done to fix all the problems. I think my efficiency has dropped about 50% even after having a month to adjust. A particular problem that hasn't been noted specifically in the recent responses is the frequent forced log-outs and very slow logins to get back in. What is the excuse for this behavior if many other pay sites that I have access to (newspapers etc.) don't do this to me?
  8. Yes I have this problem. I also get logged out more than I used to. Two of the many irritating changes.
  9. I said I was giving up but I want to give my response to this one: 1) This is not a personal issue for me. I have nothing against George, this is about a product and my dissatisfaction with the replacement. This goes exactly to my earlier post. We need to divorce the personal from the commercial. Just as those personal attacks are completely unacceptable, George should not take attacks on the product as personal attacks, and should react to them as valid customer dissatisfaction issues. 2) If this is a "labor of love" I think the whole community should reassess. For better or worse, GPA's accuracy and usability affects my pocketbook. If it is not a profitable and commercial enterprise that will be reliable for the long term, it is going to affect my approach to my investments. Everyone with a significant financial stake in comics should think about this situation. It is bad for everyone to have key man/key site risk significantly impacting the value of their holdings.
  10. I am pretty much giving up at this point because I and others have clearly laid out the problems and the response seems to be "live with it". I will for the time being, but if I find a suitable replacement I will grab it. This response ignores 90% of the complaints, which have not been that the data is not available, but that it is far, far harder to use than before. Imagine being handed a million index cards, each with one sale for one issue written on them, and being told "all the data is there". It is of course not that bad, but the data access is far, far worse than it was previously. GPA has taken a defensive stance through this episode. Clearly they are emotionally invested in what they spent a great deal of time developing without any user input. That is not a commercial attitude. GPA can get away with it for only one reason, which is they have a monopoly on the data. Instead of providing apologies to their customers, they seem to be taking offense at being called out for their amateurish mistakes. As I said in a previous post, I think the real message is to the the volume dealers/auction houses that this amount of lost goodwill is an opportunity to shift to something better and more reliable for the market, that can be used to enhance their business through adding transparency, reliability, and further legitimacy to the comic market.
  11. I use the graphs all the time and I would say that they are indispensable. The only part of the new interface that I love (not just like) is the interactive graph. Because the price data is now so hard to use, I am adapting by scrolling along the graph and reading the data points at the bottom. If I were king, at this point I would go back to the old interface but keep the interactive graphs. I would then look at the ergonomics of the old layout and try to reduce the need for clicks and navigating away. The new interface has gone in the other direction (more clicks and more navigating away). Not being able to directly compare prices for different issues of the same title (particularly adjacent issues) is just one of many downsides of the new interface. We should chip in and send GPA a set of Edward Tufte's books (The Visual Display of Quantitative Information and subsequent volumes).
  12. To me this is an unacceptably low expectation for a major product change. Users spent years getting comfortable with the old interface. Of course it was not perfect, but the only excuse for changing it is improvement. Most comments above instead significant losses in functionality. There are some improvements but these are greatly overshadowed by the reductions in usability. Yes I can learn to eat with a knife if you take away my fork, but I would not choose this progression. The treatment by the vendor and the subsequent response by the vendor to the many reasonable complaints should give everyone pause before continuing to rely on the product. As an individual I don't have much leverage and for the near term I will be forced to continue to use the service. However I think the larger players (particularly the auction houses) should give a good bit of thought to how this product impacts their business and how they should interact with it or a similar product. I think that expanding data availability and the transparency of access to that data would benefit the overall market and enhance the dealer/auction business by driving transaction volume. Margins on dealer transactions here and there would be hurt, but I think the overall net margin would increase due to buyers/sellers being more comfortable that transactions are on-market, leading to more transactions.
  13. Maybe somebody has some old CBGs lying around for additional reference?
  14. 100% agreed: - I flagged the change management issue as well - The lack of user guide is agreed; with such simple functionality, I think some of this could even be built into the interface. When I first encountered the new design, I had no idea that I had to click various buttons to get price history back before 2017. If the interface is that uninituitive, there should be labels, pop-ups, etc. to make its use directly understandable in the interface - I noted the performance issue in a email conversation that I had with a dealer. This would have been acceptable if this was a parallel beta environment provided to users for testing. It is not acceptable in an "upgrade". - I echo the final comment 100%. I have had a good experience with GPA for years, but this episode has soured me tremendously. The "not gonna happen" response from George yesterday added insult to injury on this front. It's one thing to be handed a broken replacement by a vendor - it's another for the vendor to tell you to suck it up.
  15. The check box adds that issue/grade to "My Comics". If you want rid of it you can go to "My Dashboard", select "My Comics", find that issue, expand it, and uncheck it. If you don't use "My Comics", whether or not it is checked it is irrelevant. This same functionality was in the old GPA. That inability to uncheck except by navigating away to "My Comics" was similarly annoying, although I can understand that people didn't want to uncheck by mistake if they used the feature. Better would have been a popup "are you sure you want to deselect" rather than forcing you to navigate away.