• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

CCGmod2

Administrator
  • Posts

    50
  • Joined

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. This thread is locked for pervasive inappropriate posting.
  2. I'll also step in for a moment to note that the volunteer moderators — who assist with moderation, escalate issues to administrators, provide input to administrators, and have any moderation action they take themselves reviewed by administrators later on — have done a wonderful job. I insist that feedback about moderation be pointed at moderation as a whole, or me, or CGC, or anyone who isn't a member of this community volunteering their time to improve it. Many of the statements by MrBedrock and a couple other users replying to him have referred to moderators as imbeciles, buffoons, etc. That language is unacceptable when aimed repeatedly at another member of the community here. The insulting language did not explicitly exclude the volunteer moderators, so many will interpret it as including them — which riles up other users to repeat this same language in a way that is, at least partially, aimed at members of the community who deserve much more respect. Short version: The volunteer moderators have done a great job, so aim feedback more precisely at moderation policy or the work of paid administrators like me or CGC, whatever that feedback may be.
  3. This is, indeed, just about exactly what happened. I'm the one who misinterpreted the reasoning — Sharon is more knowledgeable than I am about comic prices, and I misunderstood this comment about joking as the reason it was removed. After all, to use an extreme: If someone jokingly set a price of a billion dollars for a comic that's worth just a hundred dollars, that "joke" would also be a way of skirting around the rules that state that you must set a price in your thread. Something similar to that was the misperceived infraction that led to that warning and the removal of the second thread. There's a lot going on in that situation of removals and warnings and repostings and such on the whole, and it's too much to get into in a thread like this — the point most people are talking about is moderation policy overall, and delving into everything in this particular situation distracts from that. But many users keep asking "Why would it be removed for the price being too high?" And there's the explanation — a misunderstanding on my part.
  4. This thread very quickly became all about politics; political posting is against the rules on the CGC Chat Boards. The thread has been locked and some warnings will be given.
  5. Hi all, reminder that per the CGC Chat Boards rules, this is not a place for "Inappropriate references (analogies, etc.) to significantly emotional topics such as Nazis", and political posting is also against the rules. It's understandable to discuss how an actor's departure will affect the show, but that isn't where the recent discussion in this thread has gone. Grogu wants you to talk about some of the many other things in the Mandalorian.
  6. Hi all, I wanted to mention that we've updated the usage guidelines for the Forum Only Selling Area to include dates for the sub-forums, to help users post in the correct place. Please see below. Thank you!
  7. Please keep discussion primarily on the topic the original poster has introduced. The original ~20 pages of mostly off-topic posting have been removed.
  8. This is a reminder that the CGC Chat Boards are not the appropriate place for political discussion. See the links below for details. Thanks!
  9. Hi all, Just wanted to mention that we've updated rule #2 in the Usage Guidelines thread for the Forum Only Selling Area: The rule is now: Thanks!