KCOComics

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    528

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About KCOComics

  • Boards Title
    Collectosaurus Rex

Personal Information

  • Comic Collecting Interests
    Golden Age
    Silver Age
    Bronze Age

Recent Profile Visitors

356 profile views
  1.    KCOComics reacted to a post in a topic: Superman #1 CGC 5.0
  2.    Deadpoolica reacted to a post in a topic: PGM House of Secrets 92
  3. KCOComics
    I think it's an 8.0
  4. KCOComics
    8.0 - but a good press could bump it up a bit.
  5. KCOComics
    6.0
  6. KCOComics
    6.5. A good press would help.
  7. KCOComics
    Is that line by the spine on the back cover a pencil mark? Or crease? A dry clean may remove a pencil. Assuming it's a crease I'm at 8.0 / 8.5
  8. KCOComics
    4.0 for me.
  9. KCOComics
    That's a really beautiful book. I wouldn't be shocked by a 9.0. If the dust shadow brings it down to VF+ range, it will be about the prettiest 8.5 you could buy.
  10.    KCOComics reacted to a post in a topic: Ghostly Weird 122, GA war and Possibly more
  11.    KCOComics reacted to a post in a topic: Ghostly Weird 122, GA war and Possibly more
  12.    piper reacted to a post in a topic: THE AMAZING FANTASY #15 CLUB
  13.    migmtl76 reacted to a post in a topic: PGM Tomb of Dracula #1
  14. KCOComics
    9.0
  15. KCOComics
    Very nice copy. 8.5
  16.    KCOComics reacted to a post in a topic: Random Golden Age Sale
  17.    Deadpoolica reacted to a post in a topic: PGM X-men #1 1963
  18.    KCOComics reacted to a post in a topic: PGM X-men #1 1963
  19.    Keys_Collector reacted to a post in a topic: PGM X-men #1 1963
  20.    lotofsilver reacted to a post in a topic: PGM JIM 85 - Grade is in..
  21.    KCOComics reacted to a post in a topic: 1939 NEWSSTAND PIC TIME MACHINE JOURNEY INTO THE PAST
  22. KCOComics
    Congrats!!
  23.    KCOComics reacted to a post in a topic: PGM JIM 85 - Grade is in..
  24. KCOComics
    I'll say 7.5 after press. Nice looking book.
  25. KCOComics
    2.5 For comparison, here is my 2.0. I think yours is similar, but a little nicer. Nicer spine, cleaner presentation. (Not the best picture, but all I currently have on my phone)
  26. KCOComics
    9.0
  27. KCOComics
    9.4
  28.    KCOComics reacted to a post in a topic: Aliens Nominated to the Hall of Shame - Poll Included
  29.    KCOComics reacted to a post in a topic: Aliens Nominated to the Hall of Shame - Poll Included
  30.    KCOComics reacted to a post in a topic: daring mystery comics 2, cgc 6.0 [r] f.s. RARE
  31.    Larryw7 reacted to a post in a topic: Superman #1 CGC 5.0
  32.    circumstances reacted to a post in a topic: Superman #1 CGC 5.0
  33. KCOComics
    No, I don't either. I don't have a big issue with reversing restoration. I take issue with badly scraping books or destroying the edges to conceal trimming. If reversing restoration creates greater damage to the book, I'm not a fan. I also think any work that has been done should be disclosed to potential buyers. If I'm spending 4, 5 or 6 figures on a book, I would want to know what's been done to it. That's what I think CGC should communicate, either with a label change or through graders notes. I personally would buy a book like this superman. It presents beautifully. But I would want to know it was restored and that restoration was reversed. Disclosure - I'm saying I would buy that superman hypothetical. As I heard so many times in high school, it's out of my league.