• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Mr. Spider-Woman

Member
  • Posts

    548
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • Occupation
    Human Being
  • Location
    Earth!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I'm happy with my beater readers. They're the best I can afford. I do get a little jealous looking at nicer copies though.
  2. I just read back to the start of 2024. Saw some beautiful raw and graded books that make my beater readers look even worse by comparison: #7 - Earliest issue in my collection #26 - It only took 20+ years to get a copy of this issue to go with my #25 #49 and #52 - 'Nuff said
  3. Star Trek: Voyager Paramount Comics #1 (November 1996) Fantastic Four Volume 2 #13 (November 1997)
  4. I've read every Honor Harrington novel, many two or three times. So I had to grab these when I found them in a $1 bin. Then I had to go and buy the rest of this miniseries and the other Honor Harrington miniseries, too.
  5. Picked these up for $1 each at an antiques mall I haven't been to in seven or eight years. There was only one booth with comics and I'll need to go back to dig through all the boxes.
  6. I was excited to find the recent Playmates Star Trek: The Next Generation U.S.S. Enterprise on sale at Target. I had a bunch of the original 1990s Playmates action figures when I was a kid but none of the ships. I was not excited when it arrived and the box is beat up. I wasn't planning on taking it out of the box, I wanted it for display. The other two items shipped with it weren't damaged and there's only a minor crease on the shipping box. The shipping box was way too big and there was nothing to protect the items, no bubble wrap or packing paper. Nothing. I'm afraid if I keep opening returns with Target due to damaged items, they'll eventually ban me.
  7. My understanding is non-business sellers (aka hobby sellers) can only deduct cost of goods sold (COGS) and literally nothing else.
  8. I'm not sure it's an error. It could be Marvel printed versions of the direct and newsstand editions without the foiling on the cover. The Grand Comics Database lists four versions/variants: Guardians of the Galaxy (Marvel, 1990 series) #25 [Deluxe Direct Edition] Guardians of the Galaxy (Marvel, 1990 series) #25 [Regular Direct Edition] Guardians of the Galaxy (Marvel, 1990 series) #25 [Newsstand] Guardians of the Galaxy (Marvel, 1990 series) #25 [Deluxe Newsstand Edition] Link: https://www.comics.org/issue/1875149/ One thing that does give me pause is the fact there is no price difference between the regular (no foil) and deluxe (foil) versions. Other Marvel comics with deluxe foil comics from the 1990s did have different prices, including Guardians of the Galaxy #50. Some examples include: Excalibur #75 (March 1994) - Direct Edition - Deluxe Foil Cover ($3.50), Direct Edition - Standard ($2.25) Fantastic Four #387 (April 1994) - Deluxe Direct Edition ($2.95), Regular Direct Edition ($1.25) Guardians of the Galaxy #50 (July 1994) - Deluxe Direct Edition ($2.95), Regular Direct Edition ($2.00) Doom 2099 #25 (January 1995) - Deluxe Direct Edition ($2.95), Standard Edition ($2.25) Fantastic Four #398 (March 1995) - Deluxe Direct Edition ($2.50), Regular Direct Edition ($1.50) Spider-Man #57 (April 1995) - Direct Edition - Deluxe ($2.95), Direct Edition - Standard ($2.50) Daredevil #350 (March 1996) - Deluxe Direct Edition ($3.50), Direct Edition ($2.95) Either Marvel didn't see the need to price the regular (no foil) and deluxe (foil) versions differently for both the direct and newsstand editions OR there were printing errors resulting in both direct and newsstand editions without foil. Is it likely that printing errors for both editions exist? I don't know. I personally think it was intentional and there were no printing errors. GotG #25 has a cover date of June 1992 so it came out a few years before any of the other deluxe editions I found with a quick search of the Grand Comics Database that did have price differences. Maybe other examples of deluxe/regular editions with and without foil and no price difference exist from 1992 as well.
  9. An action figure/cartoon TV show/comic book tie-in. From Wikipedia, without any sources listed:
  10. I was in Walmart last week and saw a lone 7 for 10 hidden among the trading cards. Can't remember what the top comic was, though.
  11. I scanned through the last 10+ pages or so and didn't see a link to a post at the Comic Book Collecting group on Reddit about the CGC scandal: 140 comments so far. Not sure what that means long term but awareness of the ongoing situation definitely seems to be growing outside of this forum. I don't see anything written about the scandal at Bleeding Cool, CBR, or The Beat. There is an article at ComicBook.com: https://comicbook.com/comics/news/cgc-comics-issues-statement-on-holder-tampering-controversy/
  12. I checked the other day and all comics (DC and Marvel) are gone from my local Walmart, which recently reduced the size of its collectibles aisle to only three shelves. The other shelves were removed and replaced with stacks of water bottles.
  13. I've been wondering about the scale of the scam/fraud/whatever as well, if it involves enough money for the FBI or the FTC to get involved and commit limited resources to. The scammer can always claim the holder was broken in transit to cover for any damage caused by forcing it open. And there have been theories floated that the scammer can reseal holders after opening them up.