HotKey

First look at the inside front cover. Anyone still think that its someone with a marker or sharpie? I also got a regular copy this week for a minute, so I have microscope pics of a non error to compare as well, those will be added this weekend.

My business partner and I are going to crack this open Wednesday during our meeting so we can see the inside of the front cover and I will post pics here after for everyone. Will that be definitive? Does color touch to that possible level have to show some bleed through somewhere?

I misspoke saying "ink", just remove that word and the rest makes sense, black ink over white text when regular copies have white text over black ink.

Heres a regular copy for comparison, best pic I could find online right now

So how do you explain the black ink being above the white text ink, when it's below the white text ink on every other known copy? Also, the dots weren't used on every section, so what other type of printing was used that resulted in a solid color without dots that was consistent across the entire cover?

Microscope pic of several different areas, showing printing dots in some methods and solid ink in others. Also of note is the corner with the color breaks, if someone was going to color touch this, wouldn't they do that obvious spot?

Black light pics: I marked on the superman with a sharpie for comparison.

Regular pics:

Hello, as some of you know I specialize in foreign comics and recently came across this beauty. This is the ASM 300 from Spain, and as you can see CGC graded it a 4.5 C-2 with color touch on cover in the notes. There are a few noteworthy areas on this but the main 2 are the top where the black ink is on top of the white text, instead of behind it, and the text to the left of the bar code on the bottom, where the black ink is also covering the white text. My initial opinion was that they printed the layers on this in the wrong order, and everything I have examined has confirmed that belief. CGC disagreed, but it is also worth noting that this is a previously unknown production error, so it's understandable just seeing it and thinking someone drew on it, as the owner I got it from thought as well. I have looked at it under a black light and under a microscope, and between my business partner and I we have right around 10 hours combined of careful examination of this comic through different methods, mostly with the microscope. We are both fully convinced of this being printed in the incorrect order. I'll add pics in a few different replies to break them up into different sections so its easier to discuss each part. Another really cool thing we found were the 2 O's/0's that we found with the microscope. They appear to only be there intentionally and we have no idea for the explanation of them, although we have a couple theories. We had another comic 12 issues later from the same series and was not able to find any on that cover. The one in the black area is much more visible, but there's one in the red area as well to the left of the tear in the middle. They are both in the upper right area of the cover, with the black one being a bit more towards the center. So if anyone can think of any potential explanation for this outcome that isn't a production error, let me know, or if you agree this is definitely a production error feel free to weigh in as well. Also if you have any info about the tiny Os/0s please help with this puzzler! I've posted about this a few times over the last couple months and I haven't seen anyone else post that they have one too, but I would imagine there are at least a few others out there, just by the odds, but maybe they were thrown away when someone bought them. I think this should be a blue label noted as a production error though, I'm just not sure the best way to make sure CGC sees everything, so I figured this was a good spot as well. Pics to follow in replies, let me know what you think a production error of the most collected foreign comic cover there is would be worth!

I would hope any and all independent investigation firms looking into this take a long hard look at all the quality control posts and missing books posts from the last few years as well.

I posted a topic yesterday on IG asking if Matt Nelson should keep his job after this scandal, it got a lot of responses that were about 50/50 for and against. I don't personally know Matt, but if I did it wouldn't change my opinion of this situation, which is that this is a bad failure on management to make sure that proper chain of custody and security measures were/are in place. First there is a lack of proper security measures to prevent the reholder scandal that just happened, and now there is a lack of proper chain of custody and basic security protocols in place to prevent any one employee from having too much access to multiple departments where there would be opportunities for bad actions to take place. Whatever the reasons are that these didn't exist, the fact that they didn't exist is a clear failure of management. Whoever is in charge of the internal security of the facility also should be replaced imo for a lack of understanding and recognizing the risks from having that employee overlap exist in different areas in the first place. Some situations can be cleaned up without the need for change, some situations require changes, I think this one requires changes.

You would have to prove that CGC had prior knowledge of this and knowingly decided to conceal it from the public to have any shot at a class action.

FFS this thread has been going on since LAST YEAR!

"CGC sucks!" "No it don't" "Yes it does!" thats the jist

Has anyone with a large personal collection of the at risk comics contacted their insurance company to see how they are going to approach insuring values on potentially fraudulent cases?