• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

List of Classic Covers, designated by Overstreet and/or CGC
3 3

164 posts in this topic

The more I think about it...Will every "bondage cover" eventually become a "classic bondage cover" as it becomes older - thus becomming "classic" as in "old"?

 

Like take Spider-Woman #6. It says "Bondage Cover". Now fast forward 50 or 60 years. Will it them become a "classic bondage cover"? Just struck me looking at those.

 

What makes a cover "classic"? It's impact at the time, over the years or it's age?

 

That's really hard to say. Even when it comes to golden age books, I'd say less than 5% of the bondage covers are designated as "classic". Again, I really don't know what the criteria is in choosing one book over the other.

 

Yeah, I have to admit I'm not familiar with a vast amount of GA material. It was just seeing that from issues #89-94 CGC designated 3 classic bondage covers for one series. I wonder what made each one classic in CGC's opinion?

 

 

Actually, #90 is also designated as a "classic" cover by CGC, but my copy is PGX graded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this isn't one, it ought to be:

 

startling46.jpg

 

That's on the list along with Startling 49.

 

What's really surprising is the lack of Planet Comics covers. Planet 28 is not a classic cover? Any of the Doolin covers from 51-57 could be considered classics. Who makes these designations again? Is this just a general concensus thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time with a lot of Timelys because they all look the same. You'd have to give "classic" notation to about 2/3 of the Schomburg covers.

 

Classic should imply a run that stands out above the others. When someone mentions the title, that cover should pop into your head. When someone mentions the issue you should know it instantly. With a lot of Timelys, I still say, "which one is that?"

 

Not that they're not great covers, it's just saturation.

 

Same goes for moderns. There are a LOT of great images out there....every month. They can't all be classic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time with a lot of Timelys because they all look the same. You'd have to give "classic" notation to about 2/3 of the Schomburg covers.

 

Classic should imply a run that stands out above the others. When someone mentions the title, that cover should pop into your head. When someone mentions the issue you should know it instantly. With a lot of Timelys, I still say, "which one is that?"

 

Not that they're not great covers, it's just saturation.

 

Same goes for moderns. There are a LOT of great images out there....every month. They can't all be classic.

 

Yeah, I feel the same way about 2/3rds of Neal Adams' covers. Looking through Batman titles he did covers for, I kept thinking, "Wow, that's not a classic? It should be".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time with a lot of Timelys because they all look the same.

Thems fightin' words buddy! :sumo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another head-scratcher. This cover is so classic that it falls into the iconic category...

 

 

action252.jpg

Is it possible for a cover to be too classic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time with a lot of Timelys because they all look the same.

Thems fightin' words buddy! :sumo:

Sorry Richard, but I agree with buttock. That felt like an odd sentence to type. hm

But does buttock agree with you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time with a lot of Timelys because they all look the same.

Thems fightin' words buddy! :sumo:

Sorry Richard, but I agree with buttock. That felt like an odd sentence to type. hm

But does buttock agree with you?

For some reason that sounds nasty. (tsk)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time with a lot of Timelys because they all look the same.

Thems fightin' words buddy! :sumo:

Sorry Richard, but I agree with buttock. That felt like an odd sentence to type. hm

But does buttock agree with you?

For some reason that sounds nasty. (tsk)

 

The buttock agrees.

 

:sumo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, that Air Ace is great. Just when I thought there was no comic I hadn't seen in 35 years in the hobby...

 

I am super impressed by that book too.

 

Who is the cover artist? What is the interior art like? It is really, really great art.

 

I checked the book. 1st story is great Powell art with some more nice "talent". The rest is stock GA, although one story is pretty cool for it's having a lot of apocalyptic predictions - A-bombs & the like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
3 3