• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

"Omaha" The Cat Dancer
2 2

239 posts in this topic

Sizzle #28 was tough for me to find (I missed it in real time). This is her only cover appearance so far in the Sizzle run.

 

Important tip, Omaha has NOT been in every issue since #28. Many, but not all. I think all the issues with Omaha have cover mention of it, but my copies are not here to check.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, someone is a happy camper. And I wouldn't be surprised if it was the PGX 9.2 that was submitted into Matt Nelson.

 

 

Unfortunately, the PGX copy came back a 9.2 :(

 

:foryou:

 

Be proud, as even a 9.2 is a fantastic find with this book.

 

Now, if it is bothering you that much and you need to get that horrible grade out of your collection....

 

:popcorn:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, someone is a happy camper. And I wouldn't be surprised if it was the PGX 9.2 that was submitted into Matt Nelson.

 

 

Unfortunately, the PGX copy came back a 9.2 :(

 

:foryou:

 

Be proud, as even a 9.2 is a fantastic find with this book.

 

Now, if it is bothering you that much and you need to get that horrible grade out of your collection....

 

:popcorn:

 

If I decide to sell it at a loss, I will check with you first. (thumbs u

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:(

 

:foryou:

 

What I meant was, I have more money into this book than it's worth. :cry:

 

So I either keep it, or sell it at a loss.

 

Besides, this book has been pressed, and everyone knows pressing is restoration. lol

 

Oh, I knew what you meant. That is why I felt bad for you and did this :( and then this for better days. :foryou:

 

And I should have added this for being pressed. Why? I don't know.

 

(shrug):insane:

 

109234.jpg.ff87b3813640b12ad783f4936bc5b16d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, someone is a happy camper. And I wouldn't be surprised if it was the PGX 9.2 that was submitted into Matt Nelson.

 

 

Unfortunately, the PGX copy came back a 9.2 :(

 

Did Matt say it had a shot at a 9.4?

 

He said 9.2+

 

I guess that it means it had a shot. hm

 

Which brings up a question I have been wondering about.

 

Is it harder to give a grade estimate for pressing (e.g. "proscreen") when a book is in a slab? (shrug)

 

I'm thinking it would be.

Edited by icefires
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
2 2