5th Annual March Madness CGC Grading Tournament- Seeding Round

[Tsimanga]

 

 

Goodness.. I didn't think my comment would cause quite the stir. But hey, It's good to have it in the open.

 

Suoergoof #27... . It wasn't my book to grade so I checked the census. And I think it's a little altruistic to just say 'okay, the rule is nobody check the census.' How about do whatever you must to get the grade. That would make it more equal. And having a book like supergoof where there is obviously only one. I agree it is 'cheating' in a sense... but it's not something that can be monitored so it is what it is. Like HGH in sports.

[Black Lantern]

 

Goodness.. I didn't think my comment would cause quite the stir. But hey, It's good to have it in the open.

 

Suoergoof #27... . It wasn't my book to grade so I checked the census. And I think it's a little altruistic to just say 'okay, the rule is nobody check the census.' How about do whatever you must to get the grade. That would make it more equal. And having a book like supergoof where there is obviously only one. I agree it is 'cheating' in a sense... but it's not something that can be monitored so it is what it is. Like HGH in sports.

 

The funny part is, that you commented that on my post, where I said I graded it spot on just for fun. Why would I have to cheat when it wasn't even my game? Wouldn't make any sense. And that book wasn't really hard to grade. You can comment something like that anytime, but please don't accuse somebody of cheating. Especially me, I was one of the players at the bottom of the list in the seeding round

[trmoore54]

 

Goodness.. I didn't think my comment would cause quite the stir. But hey, It's good to have it in the open.

 

Suoergoof #27... . It wasn't my book to grade so I checked the census. And I think it's a little altruistic to just say 'okay, the rule is nobody check the census.' How about do whatever you must to get the grade. That would make it more equal. And having a book like supergoof where there is obviously only one. I agree it is 'cheating' in a sense... but it's not something that can be monitored so it is what it is. Like HGH in sports.

 

Here's how it should work in my opinion...

1. Look at the scans and grade the books.

2. Send grades/guesses to Nostalgic Attic.

3. Wait for results.

 

Rinse/repeat...

 

I mean...c'mon...it's a grading contest...not a sleuthing contest ...last I checked there wasn't an Action 1 up for grabs in the prizes...

 

The point is to test your grading prowess against your opponent...and to improve your grading skills...even if you get bounced it's good practice to play along to the end...

 

 

[Tsimanga]

 

Goodness.. I didn't think my comment would cause quite the stir. But hey, It's good to have it in the open.

 

Suoergoof #27... . It wasn't my book to grade so I checked the census. And I think it's a little altruistic to just say 'okay, the rule is nobody check the census.' How about do whatever you must to get the grade. That would make it more equal. And having a book like supergoof where there is obviously only one. I agree it is 'cheating' in a sense... but it's not something that can be monitored so it is what it is. Like HGH in sports.

 

The funny part is, that you commented that on my post, where I said I graded it spot on just for fun. Why would I have to cheat when it wasn't even my game? Wouldn't make any sense. And that book wasn't really hard to grade. You can comment something like that anytime, but please don't accuse somebody of cheating. Especially me, I was one of the players at the bottom of the list in the seeding round

 

 

My comment to you was just a joke. Playful ribbing, not meaning to accuse you of anything. That would make no sense.

 

And I personally don't find it as cheating as I've never seen it commented anywhere that it was against the rules. Besides, it's just a silly grading contest... if someone wants to look at the census I say go for it. It will probably only help if another Supergoof book comes into play.

[Tsimanga]

I know I contradicted my earlier post... but after thinking it over... it is what it is.

[InvstmntComcSuply]

FINAL SCORE

 

grinin 75

azsumilo 36

 

grinin better pack their bags and head to the NW.

Good job Grinn, and thanks again for all the microchamber paper

 

 

Thanks!

 

My ascension continues! Watch out Liaton!!!

 

Glad the microchamber paper got there quick!

[Trev]

 

Goodness.. I didn't think my comment would cause quite the stir. But hey, It's good to have it in the open.

 

Suoergoof #27... . It wasn't my book to grade so I checked the census. And I think it's a little altruistic to just say 'okay, the rule is nobody check the census.' How about do whatever you must to get the grade. That would make it more equal. And having a book like supergoof where there is obviously only one. I agree it is 'cheating' in a sense... but it's not something that can be monitored so it is what it is. Like HGH in sports.

 

The funny part is, that you commented that on my post, where I said I graded it spot on just for fun. Why would I have to cheat when it wasn't even my game? Wouldn't make any sense. And that book wasn't really hard to grade. You can comment something like that anytime, but please don't accuse somebody of cheating. Especially me, I was one of the players at the bottom of the list in the seeding round

 

 

My comment to you was just a joke. Playful ribbing, not meaning to accuse you of anything. That would make no sense.

 

And I personally don't find it as cheating as I've never seen it commented anywhere that it was against the rules. Besides, it's just a silly grading contest... if someone wants to look at the census I say go for it. It will probably only help if another Supergoof book comes into play.

 

That's why I asked for the ruling. Now it has been commented that it is against rules. Let's all play that way.

[TheLiamSturgess]

FINAL SCORE

 

grinin 75

azsumilo 36

 

grinin better pack their bags and head to the NW.

Good job Grinn, and thanks again for all the microchamber paper

 

 

Thanks!

 

My ascension continues! Watch out Liaton!!!

 

Glad the microchamber paper got there quick!

 

Challenge accepted!!!

[aszumilo]

FINAL SCORE

 

grinin 75

azsumilo 36

 

grinin better pack their bags and head to the NW.

Good job Grinn, and thanks again for all the microchamber paper

 

 

Thanks!

 

My ascension continues! Watch out Liaton!!!

 

Glad the microchamber paper got there quick!

 

Go and make us low seeded players proud!!!!

[Nostalgic Attic]

If you haven't gotten your grades in for the round of 64.......nows the time!

[Black Lantern]

 

Goodness.. I didn't think my comment would cause quite the stir. But hey, It's good to have it in the open.

 

Suoergoof #27... . It wasn't my book to grade so I checked the census. And I think it's a little altruistic to just say 'okay, the rule is nobody check the census.' How about do whatever you must to get the grade. That would make it more equal. And having a book like supergoof where there is obviously only one. I agree it is 'cheating' in a sense... but it's not something that can be monitored so it is what it is. Like HGH in sports.

 

The funny part is, that you commented that on my post, where I said I graded it spot on just for fun. Why would I have to cheat when it wasn't even my game? Wouldn't make any sense. And that book wasn't really hard to grade. You can comment something like that anytime, but please don't accuse somebody of cheating. Especially me, I was one of the players at the bottom of the list in the seeding round

 

 

My comment to you was just a joke. Playful ribbing, not meaning to accuse you of anything. That would make no sense.

 

And I personally don't find it as cheating as I've never seen it commented anywhere that it was against the rules. Besides, it's just a silly grading contest... if someone wants to look at the census I say go for it. It will probably only help if another Supergoof book comes into play.

 

 

Okay, than it was a misunderstanding (thumbs u