• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CGC Acquires Classics Inc - Response to your Questions

1,162 posts in this topic

No. Why would they? They haven't in the past and what would make you think they would change that stance now?

My question was directed to Steve Eichenbaum, I didn't know you were working for CGC and could answer for them.

 

As for why they would, one of the reasons that was given in the past is that pressing was very hard to detect and then that there was no way for CGC to confirm that a book has been pressed or not.

 

Now that this is going to change for several books, I would like to know what will be CGC stance for the books that they now know for sure that have been pressed.

 

Thank you in advance Mr Eichenbaum for your upcoming answer to my question.

I guess thinking about how things work at CGC is being a toughie for you.

So to make sure there is no conflict of interest CGC he graders have no idea as to who has submitted books or what if anything has been done to them.

Why would that change? For it to change it would mean that the graders would have to be made aware of which books have or have not. Let that happen and see what kind of hell breaks loose.

So, while I am not working for CGC I did sleep in my own bed last night and didn't need a lot of mental acuity to come up with an answer to your moronic question.

 

Bazinga

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Why would they? They haven't in the past and what would make you think they would change that stance now?

My question was directed to Steve Eichenbaum, I didn't know you were working for CGC and could answer for them.

 

As for why they would, one of the reasons that was given in the past is that pressing was very hard to detect and then that there was no way for CGC to confirm that a book has been pressed or not.

 

Now that this is going to change for several books, I would like to know what will be CGC stance for the books that they now know for sure that have been pressed.

 

Thank you in advance Mr Eichenbaum for your upcoming answer to my question.

I guess thinking about how things work at CGC is being a toughie for you.

So to make sure there is no conflict of interest CGC he graders have no idea as to who has submitted books or what if anything has been done to them.

Why would that change? For it to change it would mean that the graders would have to be made aware of which books have or have not. Let that happen and see what kind of hell breaks loose.

So, while I am not working for CGC I did sleep in my own bed last night and didn't need a lot of mental acuity to come up with an answer to your moronic question.

Wow, first class, I see that you cannot answer my post without calling names or bullying when you disagree.

 

I am more polite than that and will just say that I don't care about your answer but would rather like to know the official answer from CGC and if my question is so moronic, well, then they will tell me themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Why would they? They haven't in the past and what would make you think they would change that stance now?

My question was directed to Steve Eichenbaum, I didn't know you were working for CGC and could answer for them.

 

As for why they would, one of the reasons that was given in the past is that pressing was very hard to detect and then that there was no way for CGC to confirm that a book has been pressed or not.

 

Now that this is going to change for several books, I would like to know what will be CGC stance for the books that they now know for sure that have been pressed.

 

Thank you in advance Mr Eichenbaum for your upcoming answer to my question.

I guess thinking about how things work at CGC is being a toughie for you.

So to make sure there is no conflict of interest CGC he graders have no idea as to who has submitted books or what if anything has been done to them.

Why would that change? For it to change it would mean that the graders would have to be made aware of which books have or have not. Let that happen and see what kind of hell breaks loose.

So, while I am not working for CGC I did sleep in my own bed last night and didn't need a lot of mental acuity to come up with an answer to your question.

Wow, first class, I see that you cannot answer my post without calling names or bullying when you disagree.

 

I am more polite than that and will just say that I don't care about your answer but would rather like to know the official answer from CGC and if my question is so moronic, well, then they will tell me themselves.

Just answering in kind with the same condescension that you gave me. Nothing more nothing less.

Bullying? You got snotty and got it right back. Not exactly bullying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Why would they? They haven't in the past and what would make you think they would change that stance now?

My question was directed to Steve Eichenbaum, I didn't know you were working for CGC and could answer for them.

 

As for why they would, one of the reasons that was given in the past is that pressing was very hard to detect and then that there was no way for CGC to confirm that a book has been pressed or not.

 

Now that this is going to change for several books, I would like to know what will be CGC stance for the books that they now know for sure that have been pressed.

 

Thank you in advance Mr Eichenbaum for your upcoming answer to my question.

I guess thinking about how things work at CGC is being a toughie for you.

So to make sure there is no conflict of interest CGC he graders have no idea as to who has submitted books or what if anything has been done to them.

Why would that change? For it to change it would mean that the graders would have to be made aware of which books have or have not. Let that happen and see what kind of hell breaks loose.

So, while I am not working for CGC I did sleep in my own bed last night and didn't need a lot of mental acuity to come up with an answer to your question.

Wow, first class, I see that you cannot answer my post without calling names or bullying when you disagree.

 

I am more polite than that and will just say that I don't care about your answer but would rather like to know the official answer from CGC and if my question is so moronic, well, then they will tell me themselves.

Just answering in kind with the same condescension that you gave me. Nothing more nothing less.

Bullying? You got snotty and got it right back. Not exactly bullying.

Happy Turkey Day Arex. :foryou:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Conflict of interest? Of course it is! But we wouldn't do any of the many things we [i[could[/i] do to make a buck. Trust us, because trust is really all you have."

 

Not saying I wouldn't trust them, but this is a serious conflict of interest no matter how trustworthy the company is. It's like McDonalds somehow buying out the FDA. McDonalds wouldn't sell you poison, would they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Conflict of interest? Of course it is! But we wouldn't do any of the many things we [i[could[/i] do to make a buck. Trust us, because trust is really all you have."

 

Not saying I wouldn't trust them, but this is a serious conflict of interest no matter how trustworthy the company is. It's like McDonalds somehow buying out the FDA. McDonalds wouldn't sell you poison, would they?

If you have not juiced your ride yet. No responses allowed other than "I am sorry I have not juiced this Beetch yet"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Why would they? They haven't in the past and what would make you think they would change that stance now?

My question was directed to Steve Eichenbaum, I didn't know you were working for CGC and could answer for them.

 

As for why they would, one of the reasons that was given in the past is that pressing was very hard to detect and then that there was no way for CGC to confirm that a book has been pressed or not.

 

Now that this is going to change for several books, I would like to know what will be CGC stance for the books that they now know for sure that have been pressed.

 

Thank you in advance Mr Eichenbaum for your upcoming answer to my question.

I guess thinking about how things work at CGC is being a toughie for you.

So to make sure there is no conflict of interest CGC he graders have no idea as to who has submitted books or what if anything has been done to them.

Why would that change? For it to change it would mean that the graders would have to be made aware of which books have or have not. Let that happen and see what kind of hell breaks loose.

So, while I am not working for CGC I did sleep in my own bed last night and didn't need a lot of mental acuity to come up with an answer to your moronic question.

Wow, first class, I see that you cannot answer my post without calling names or bullying when you disagree.

 

I am more polite than that and will just say that I don't care about your answer but would rather like to know the official answer from CGC and if my question is so moronic, well, then they will tell me themselves.

Just answering in kind with the same condescension that you gave me. Nothing more nothing less.

Bullying? You got snotty and got it right back. Not exactly bullying.

There was no condescension nor snottiness in my post but yours is full of it.

 

I am done discussing with you.

 

Enjoy your Thanksgiving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear [ name ],

I want you to know how much I appreciate you posting this professionally written FAQ. Because of you I will be able to [ submit my comics and get that grade I’ve always wanted, etc ].

 

Thanks again for thinking of me!

 

[Affectionately, Fondly, Much love, Take care, Warm regards….][your signature]

 

This thank-you template was effortlessly copied and pasted from a "Thank-you Example and Tips site!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, so Matt can't sell books but does he still have a financial interest in WorldWide?

 

Jim

Matt Nelson is off to Florida to do GREAT things at CGC!!! Although it saddens our hearts to lose the best comic partner there is in the business today, we at WorldWide Comics were surprised but very pleased that CGC persuaded the co-owner of our company to help lead them to the future. In the years we have spent devising the concept of the Pedigree Book (which will be finished) and creating WorldWide Comics, Matt has proven himself to be one of the few comic specialists with the integrity, expertise and knowledge that I would have wanted to partner with. CGC could not have selected a better person to help lead them at this time. We realize that a few people will look at his arrival at CGC in a negative light, but we know it will elevate CGC to higher levels. We are expecting great things for the market with Matt helping take the most pivotal company in the comic collecting world to new heights. Thanks for the the years you spent with us Matt. --- Stephen Ritter - WorldWide Comics

 

 

 

WW Comics

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Resto removal?

Classics will still offer this service. However, Classics can now work with CGC to ensure all removal is achieved before grading which will eliminate wasted CGC fees.

 

As an independent member of the Certified Collectibles Group (CCG) of companies, Classics will operate as a stand alone business separate from CGC.

 

Who from CGC will be working with CI on the resto detection in the instances of removal? And if CI are still an independent company, how come CGC will be allowed to do this now?

 

Not being arsey here, just a genuine question out of interest.

I am curious about this as well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Why would they? They haven't in the past and what would make you think they would change that stance now?

My question was directed to Steve Eichenbaum, I didn't know you were working for CGC and could answer for them.

 

As for why they would, one of the reasons that was given in the past is that pressing was very hard to detect and then that there was no way for CGC to confirm that a book has been pressed or not.

 

Now that this is going to change for several books, I would like to know what will be CGC stance for the books that they now know for sure that have been pressed.

 

Thank you in advance Mr Eichenbaum for your upcoming answer to my question.

I guess thinking about how things work at CGC is being a toughie for you.

So to make sure there is no conflict of interest CGC he graders have no idea as to who has submitted books or what if anything has been done to them.

Why would that change? For it to change it would mean that the graders would have to be made aware of which books have or have not. Let that happen and see what kind of hell breaks loose.

So, while I am not working for CGC I did sleep in my own bed last night and didn't need a lot of mental acuity to come up with an answer to your question.

Wow, first class, I see that you cannot answer my post without calling names or bullying when you disagree.

 

I am more polite than that and will just say that I don't care about your answer but would rather like to know the official answer from CGC and if my question is so moronic, well, then they will tell me themselves.

Just answering in kind with the same condescension that you gave me. Nothing more nothing less.

Bullying? You got snotty and got it right back. Not exactly bullying.

 

Well reading this I would have to agree you did both. And imo the only moronic question is the question that goes unasked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Resto removal?

Classics will still offer this service. However, Classics can now work with CGC to ensure all removal is achieved before grading which will eliminate wasted CGC fees.

 

As an independent member of the Certified Collectibles Group (CCG) of companies, Classics will operate as a stand alone business separate from CGC.

 

Who from CGC will be working with CI on the resto detection in the instances of removal? And if CI are still an independent company, how come CGC will be allowed to do this now?

 

Not being arsey here, just a genuine question out of interest.

I am curious about this as well.

Me too, and that is what did lead to my question

Link to comment
Share on other sites