• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

2014 March Madness Comic Grading Tournament - Round of 128

Started by BlowUpTheMoon,

322 posts in this topic

ARK

ARK

Posted
Posted
15 -1 and a second seed . :roflmao:

This thing must be broken .

 

That's what I thought when I got home yesterday and finally saw the scores in.

 

At 29-2 with 6 bulls and 2nd seed and behind teams with less then 20 wins.

 

I believe that NA didn't use percentage on the seeding round but wins minus losses or something like that.

 

But the tourney goes on. :headbang:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joe_collector

joe_collector

Posted
Posted
I believe that NA didn't use percentage on the seeding round but wins minus losses or something like that.

 

Wins minus Losses, with tiebreaks broken on number of bullsye's, is the fairest method of determining seeding

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shark

Shark

Posted
Posted
I believe that NA didn't use percentage on the seeding round but wins minus losses or something like that.

 

Wins minus Losses, with tiebreaks broken on number of bullsye's, is the fairest method of determining seeding

 

+1

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
revat

revat

Posted
Posted

I pretty much feel like I've been eliminated already. I'm bad at this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1Cool

1Cool

Posted
Posted
WOW...that first book is a mind-f*@&! :censored:

 

Please don't comment on the books in play.

 

Lets not talk about the books until after the round is done. Plenty of time to lament our bad picks after Monday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sckao

sckao

Posted
Posted
15 -1 and a second seed . :roflmao:

This thing must be broken .

 

That's what I thought when I got home yesterday and finally saw the scores in.

 

At 29-2 with 6 bulls and 2nd seed and behind teams with less then 20 wins.

 

I believe that NA didn't use percentage on the seeding round but wins minus losses or something like that.

 

But the tourney goes on. :headbang:

 

 

Yeah... The straight math percentage hurt you this time. NA actually did it in a hybrid way.. He went mostly by percentage but would have goosed you into a #1 Seed.

 

(I agree you should have been a #1 seed and earned a bye.) :foryou:

 

Awesome SEEDING ROUND, btw, (worship)

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlowUpTheMoon

BlowUpTheMoon

Posted
  • Author
Posted
15 -1 and a second seed . :roflmao:

This thing must be broken .

 

That's what I thought when I got home yesterday and finally saw the scores in.

 

At 29-2 with 6 bulls and 2nd seed and behind teams with less then 20 wins.

 

I believe that NA didn't use percentage on the seeding round but wins minus losses or something like that.

 

But the tourney goes on. :headbang:

 

 

Yeah... The straight math percentage hurt you this time. NA actually did it in a hybrid way.. He went mostly by percentage but would have goosed you into a #1 Seed.

 

(I agree you should have been a #1 seed and earned a bye.) :foryou:

 

 

Yup. My mistake on this - you should have gotten a bye. I rushed to put together the brackets and simply went by the numbers when issuing byes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sckao

sckao

Posted
Posted
I believe that NA didn't use percentage on the seeding round but wins minus losses or something like that.

 

Wins minus Losses, with tiebreaks broken on number of bullsye's, is the fairest method of determining seeding

 

That's interesting. hm

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Go to topic listing