• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

'Shazam' movie official thread (because he deserves one too)
3 3

1,885 posts in this topic

On 5/18/2020 at 1:51 PM, theCapraAegagrus said:

Re-watched this on Saturday.

It seems like after the attack on Savana Industries, they got lazy with the VFX for the 7 Deadly Sins. not sure if I shared that observation before.

I'll rewatch it AGAIN this weekend. But I don't see that.

Even when Shazam fights Sivana in the end, and Envy comes pouring out of Sivana, to me the CGI looks really smooth and natural.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Just because Venom, Deadpool and Joker overperformed doesn’t mean every comic book superhero movie needs to flirt with $1 billion worldwide to be a successful release.

 

Just because Deadpool earned $763 million worldwide on a $58 million budget (despite/because of its R-rating and cheeky tone) doesn’t mean every small-scale comic book flick has to perform likewise. While Venom was a surprise super-smash at $854 million worldwide, including $272 million in China alone, it was certainly budgeted at a level (around $90 million) to not require even 45% of that to be a hit. Ditto Warner Bros.’ Joker which earned $1.074 billion (without a penny from China) despite being an R-rated, grimdark character study with minimal action and violence. It earned 17x its $62.5 million budget, making it the most profitable (rate-of-return) comic book flick ever. However, if you’re among those on social media arguing that Shazam! was a bomb because it only earned $366 million worldwide, this post is for you.

 

We get into this discussion every now and then, with smaller-sized installments of successful franchises finding themselves on the defensive when they only break out a little bit compared to their predecessors. In 2013, The Wolverine was tagged as a disappointment after it “only” opened with $53 million in its domestic debut. Never mind that A) it was following a much-disliked X-Men Origins: Wolverine (which earned just $179 million domestic from an $85 million debut in 2009) and B) it had little to sell beyond the mere idea of Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine/Logan in a stand-alone adventure set in Japan. But the James Mangold flick cost just $120 million to produce, and in the end it earned $132 million domestic and (partially due to being the first X-Men film to play in 3-D) $416 million worldwide.

 

That brings us to DC Films’ Shazam! The New Line/Warner Bros. film, based on a comparatively cult superhero character and starring a somewhat known but not absurdly famous Zachary Levi, was budgeted at around $90 million. That meant that the David F. Sandberg-directed action fantasy arguably had to earn figures about on par with New Line’s Conjuring Universe flick (over/under $300 million)  to qualify as a success. And yes, expectations may have been set a bit high after both Deadpool movies topped $760 million worldwide on budgets of $58 million and $110 million in 2016 and 2018. Venom roaring to $214 million from an $80 million debut probably didn’t help, nor did (relatively speaking) Aquaman swimming to $335 million domestic and $1.048 billion worldwide or the rave pre-release reviews and word-of-mouth for this newest DC Films flick.

 

The film’s $365.9 million global cume was not that far off absent a blow-out run in China ($218 million) of Steven Spielberg’s $175 million Ready Player One which earned $135 million domestic and $581 million worldwide. More importantly, Shazam! (the best superhero movie of 2019) grossed 4.065x its production budget in theatrical earnings alone. That was about on par with Sony’s $90 million Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (the best superhero movie of 2018) and its $375.5 million global cume just months earlier. Of course, you still have folks arguing that the acclaimed, incredibly leggy ($190 million domestic from a $35 million debut) and Oscar-winning toon is a disappointment because it didn’t gross as much as the live-action Spidey flicks, but then that’s why I write posts like these from time to time.

 

Shazam! also earned, all told (so says Deadline) a profit of around $74 million when all was said and done in terms of marketing, post-theatrical and profit-participation deals. So, yes, Shazam! 2 is now slated for November 4, 2022, which is now the same date as Mission: Impossible 8 (uh oh) and just six weeks before the planned December 16, 2022 release of Aquaman 2. Both The Wolverine and Ant-Man would spawn sequels (Logan in 2017 and Ant-Man and the Wasp in 2018) which would each earn over $200 million domestic and $600 million worldwide. I can only hope that reviews, financial success, legs (up until weekend four) and post-theatrical discovery can indeed position Shazam 2 as a possible breakout sequel. Spider-Verse 2 (October 23, 2022) could be a monster breakout sequel, but that’s another conversation.

 

Yes, Cathy Yan’s Birds of Prey, quality and reviews notwithstanding, was a genuine disappointment, earning $203 million worldwide on an $82 million budget. A follow-up would be risky since breakout sequels stem from initially profitable franchise-starters like Austin Powers ($68 million/$16.5 million). Birds of Prey had a similar rate of return to, for example, Mad Max: Fury Road ($375 million/$150 million) and both films likely missed “theatrical break-even” status by not getting a Chinese playdate. But Shazam! was an unqualified hit, earning a higher rate-of-return than (deep breath) Man of Steel ($668 million/$225 million), Batman v Superman ($873 million/$250 million), Justice League ($656 million/$300 million), Ant-Man ($519 million/$130 million) and The Wolverine ($412 million/$120 million). Just because Joker, Venom and Deadpool overperformed doesn’t make Shazam! a miss by virtue of its “good enough” global grosses.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
3 3