Phantom Stranger No. 5 (1952)

[piper]

What do y'all think?

 

 

[Bunky Brian]

3.5 to 4.0

[Point Five]

3.5. Nice!

 

 

[Mio]

4

[Artboy99]

3.5. Nice!

 

 

+1.

 

Question, is the bottom staple still attached to the book or is it popped?

 

 

[DR.X]

3.5 and a very solid one but 4.0 would not surprise me due to the fact there are no pieces or chunks out.

[piper]

3.5. Nice!

 

 

+1.

 

Question, is the bottom staple still attached to the book or is it popped?

 

 

Not popped.

[rjpb]

I was thinking 3.0 due to the amount of creasing and the rubbing along the spine, along with the tear at the bottom. If the spine is solid and everything secure, and the PQ is solid, it could be a borderline 3.5.

[Comicdey]

3.5 is my top guess

[sterlingcomics]

These early issues are IMPOSSIBLE in high grade. 3.5 at the least. Nice!

[Ron Rau]

3.5

[jimjum12]

I was thinking 3.0 due to the amount of creasing and the rubbing along the spine, along with the tear at the bottom. If the spine is solid and everything secure, and the PQ is solid, it could be a borderline 3.5.

 

.... This is where I'm at as well...... GOD BLESS....

 

-jimbo(a friend of jesus)

[piper]

It looks like we have a consensus. Thanks everyone!

[pemart1966]

You can't judge a book by its cover.

 

Anyone grading this would be...well, grading the cover only as that's all that's shown.

[The-Collector]

3.5 bottom of FC is just a bit too rough for 4.0

[bounty_coder]

3.5 does seem right on this. It is an attractive 3.5 though due to it's completness.