First Lois Lane Cover 0

[valiantman]

On 2/15/2020 at 3:34 PM, Electricmastro said:

So has it been officially confirmed that this isn’t Lois, even when considering the possibility of how the hair color may have been a mistake?
 

They'd never make such an obvious hair color mistake on a Superman book! 

[JazzMan]

 graded 07/27/2020

 graded 07/28/2020

CGC Needs to make up its mind on which is the 1st LL cover.

@valiantman So which one is it?

Edited August 27, 2020 by JazzMan

[William-James88]

3 minutes ago, JazzMan said:

 graded 07/27/2020

 graded 07/28/2020

CGC Needs to make up its mind on which is the 1st LL cover.

[comicdonna]

On 2/15/2020 at 3:47 PM, Chillax23 said:

Wanted to bump this up - I understand that Overstreet now lists Action 27 as the 1st Lois Lane Cover - assumign this is correct (I do nto have the new Overstreet) - how long will it be before CGC adjusts their label to reflect Action 27 as the first Lois cover?

I am trying to hunt down a low grade Action 27 (shameless plug if someone is selling a CGC 2.0 or so) - but wondering if I can send it in for a label upgrade.

I am guessing CGC added #27 as the 1st Lois cover, and didn't change the #29 notation.  

[JazzMan]

2 hours ago, comicdonna said:

I am guessing CGC added #27 as the 1st Lois cover, and didn't change the #29 notation.  

Mike, what does your dog think about this issue?

[valiantman]

On 8/27/2020 at 11:57 AM, JazzMan said:

 graded 07/27/2020

 graded 07/28/2020

CGC Needs to make up its mind on which is the 1st LL cover.

@valiantman So which one is it?

It's definitely the #27 unless you believe that it's #29.  These are what people now like to call "alternative facts".  

[JazzMan]

1 hour ago, valiantman said:

It's definitely the #27 unless you believe that it's #29.  These are what people now like to call "alternative facts".  

[rjpb]

#27 certainly looks like a Lois Lane cover, but since it doesn't reference an actual story, I guess we will never be certain of the artist's intent. Either way, #29 is undoubtably a classic Lois Lane cover, which alone could justify added value. 

 

[valiantman]

On 8/29/2020 at 1:44 PM, rjpb said:

#27 certainly looks like a Lois Lane cover, but since it doesn't reference an actual story, I guess we will never be certain of the artist's intent. Either way, #29 is undoubtably a classic Lois Lane cover, which alone could justify added value. 

I like #29 because it looks like a "sequel" to Action Comics #1 where the bad guys got the car fixed, made it a convertible, and figured kidnapping Lois Lane as revenge for Action #1 would be a good plan. 

[comicdonna]

BTW, CGC notes Action #57 as the 2nd Lois Lane cover in title.  

[Timely]

On 8/29/2020 at 1:44 PM, rjpb said:

#27 certainly looks like a Lois Lane cover, but since it doesn't reference an actual story, I guess we will never be certain of the artist's intent. Either way, #29 is undoubtably a classic Lois Lane cover, which alone could justify added value. 

 

What are you taking about? It absolutely references a story, the story in Action Comics #27. In the story, Lois Lane Is wearing the exact yellow dress you see on the cover! What more proof does anyone need? 

[Primetime]

17 hours ago, Timely said:

What are you taking about? It absolutely references a story, the story in Action Comics #27. In the story, Lois Lane Is wearing the exact yellow dress you see on the cover! What more proof does anyone need? 

Overstreet agrees...just waiting for CGC to note on their labels....also waiting for CGC to note "1st round shield" on their Cap #2 labels, but that's another issue. 

[Larryw7]

I still think it's 23.

[Timely]

12 hours ago, Larryw7 said:

I still think it's 23.

That MAY have been the intent, but since Lois does not have brown hair nor is she wearing a green dress in that story, it cannot be validated!