• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Detective Comics #35 (Larson Pedigree) no longer PLOD
1 1

167 posts in this topic

18 hours ago, oakman29 said:

Funny how pressing opened the door to other manipulation that seems to just be "okay" now.

Pressing was always going to be OK because it's too undedectable (with any degree of certainty) for anyone to try to detect it. And it is more or less benign.

Nobody is saying cleaning is 'OK', meaning it gets a hall pass. It's FREAKING noted on the label, people. It's noted on both labels. The only thing that has changed is the designation from Restoration to Conservation. It's still the SAME BOOK with the SAME INFORMATION.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Sqeggs said:

1.  Dry cleaning -- blue label

2.  Chemical cleaning -- Restored

3.  Water cleaning -- Conserved

Dry cleaning is really just erasure.

I can understand the point of placing 'cleaning' under a conserved label. It removes things from the paper that potentially may be harmful to the paper (or book). That is likely the reasoning for the change (along with all the other things that have moved from a Restored to a Conserved label).

From what I understand, the reason for the change was so that the stigma of restoration would be removed from remedies which truly do help preserve the book structurally...because eventually, ALL books will need some form of work to preserve them. 

All of the work is still listed on the label and people can still choose based on the description

1) how much they want to pay

2) how much they want to avoid certain techniques

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, VintageComics said:

2.  Chemical cleaning -- Restored

Some chemicals used for cleaning evaporate after use and are essentially undetectible.  They have minimal efficacy for common cover problems which is why water is the usual cleaning agent even with it's collateral damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, adamstrange said:

Some chemicals used for cleaning evaporate after use and are essentially undetectible.  They have minimal efficacy for common cover problems which is why water is the usual cleaning agent even with it's collateral damage.

Then why isn't removing rust from staples conservation rather than restoration?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Timely said:

Removing rust from staples is conservation.

 

Not according to CCS...check out their FAQs on Restoration and Conservation- no where is it mentioned that cleaning staples is  conservation.

 

https://www.cgccomics.com/ccs-pressing/

Edited by bronze johnny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bronze johnny said:

 

Not according to CCS...check out their FAQs on Restoration and Conservation- no where is it mentioned that cleaning staples is  conservation.

 

https://www.cgccomics.com/ccs-pressing/

I guess they Qualify those based on these results.

 

https://comics.ha.com/c/search-results.zx?N=790+231+52&Ntk=SI_Titles&Nty=1&Ntt=staples+cleaned&ic4=KeywordSearch-A-K-071316

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really go after the kinds of books that are restored or have had conservation work done on them but I'm curious from those who have been watching  prices on these.  Typically, How much more does a conserved book get vs an equivalent graded purple label book?

Basically, how has the market borne out so far since the designation was added?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, VintageComics said:

Dry cleaning is really just erasure.

 

Good point.  Dry cleaning in this context means something very different from dry cleaning in the context of removing stains from clothing, where, of course, chemicals are used. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Timely said:
3 hours ago, bronze johnny said:

 

Not according to CCS...check out their FAQs on Restoration and Conservation- nowhere is it mentioned that cleaning staples is  conservation.

 

https://www.cgccomics.com/ccs-pressing/

I guess they Qualify those based on these results.

 

https://comics.ha.com/c/search-results.zx?N=790+231+52&Ntk=SI_Titles&Nty=1&Ntt=staples+cleaned&ic4=KeywordSearch-A-K-071316

Yet here https://www.cgccomics.com/news/viewarticle.aspx?IDArticle=4030& they state:

Introduction of the Conservation Scale
Specific repairs done to improve the structural integrity and long-term preservation of a comic book will now be classified as “conservation” and designated with a blue / purple label. These repairs include tear seals, support, staple replacement, piece reattachment and certain kinds of cleaning.

It would be very odd if staple cleaning would lead to a Restored label while staple replacement would get a Conserved label.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Timely said:

Obviously CGC "qualified" those books back when you worked there. Those are all very old label examples. They label them differently now.

How would you guys at the other grading service label those books? Do y'all even make a distinction between Conserved and Restored? 

Edited by MrBedrock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, szavisca said:

I don't really go after the kinds of books that are restored or have had conservation work done on them but I'm curious from those who have been watching  prices on these.  Typically, How much more does a conserved book get vs an equivalent graded purple label book?

Basically, how has the market borne out so far since the designation was added?  

I don’t either but that’s because I grew up in the time where most restoration wasn’t done by professionals looking to save or help books but by shady dealers or collectors trying to trick buyers into buying something for more money than what it’s worth. Sadly there’s still some out there that won’t disclose work done on books unless they are outed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Timely said:

Removing rust from staples is conservation.

 

8 hours ago, Gotham Kid said:

Staple cleaning should be considered conservation imo.

 

I would rather have staples either cleaned or replaced and placed in a different holder (restored or conserved) than have rusty staples on a book in a regular holder. That’s going to do damage to the rest of the book over time and is something why the hobby needs to reconsider its attitude towards restored or conserved books that have had legit needed work done. The super HG restored “Frankenstein”books sold at ComicConnect aren’t helping matters with people understanding the need either. :frown:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a good part of the reason why different colored labels were a problem from the get-go. People react viscerally to colors, and assign a form of emotional reaction to them that tends to overrule logic and reason when considering just what has been done, to what extent.

People even gave them epithets based on the color of the label...something as meaningless to the actual condition of the book as the font of the label. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In general I prefer unrestored books but availability and price can provide motivation to purchase a book. Personally I prefer an easy way to distinguish between the various books such as color.  We have had heated arguments on purple labels before and never agree on an acceptable solution.   I bought this book several years back. The hammer price I paid was 1/5 guide for an unrestored copy which is probably closer to 1/10 what an unrestored copy would sell for.

 

IMG_2677.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, N e r V said:

I would rather have staples either cleaned or replaced and placed in a different holder (restored or conserved) than have rusty staples on a book in a regular holder.

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MrBedrock said:
2 hours ago, Timely said:

Obviously CGC "qualified" those books back when you worked there. Those are all very old label examples. They label them differently now.

How would you guys at the other grading service label those books? Do y'all even make a distinction between Conserved and Restored? 

:popcorn:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
1 1