• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Tales to Astonish 100 -- signed by Dan Adkins?
0

4 posts in this topic

Just got this in today with no story/provenance:

TTA100-adkins_20180714_0001.thumb.jpg.787709b1c5383231eeccc83b15ef0f5a.jpg

Any chance that the sig is legit? 

If it is, and given that it's on the front cover in ballpoint, rather than at the bottom of the splash page, as was commonplace for autographs back in the day, I'm wondering if this might have been his personal copy?

What say the experts?

Thanks! -Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adkins worked mostly as an inker, but the times I have seen his original pencils, it is signed in a stylized block letter signature style.  I suspect that was little Danny Adkins' personal copy that he bought at the drugstore in Ames IA with his paper route money!  :foryou:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adkins inked the cover. I wonder if some fan at convention asked him to sign the cover for that reason.  The more common spot was obviously the first page in those days, but it wasn’t unheard of to have an occasional cover signed.

Also: what incentive would someone have to forge the inker’s sig?

Still, I agree with Sean, in that I haven’t seen that style of sig by him before ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, thanks all.  Adkins also inked the interior of this issue, over Marie Severin's pencils -- great stuff.

What struck me as interesting is that the signature at the top of the cover also includes Adkins' correct middle initial ("L"), which would probably not have been widely known in fandom back in the day, when he was generally credited (at Marvel) as just "Dan Adkins" or "Dapper Dan Adkins". 

It's not out of the realm of possibility that little Danny Adkins in Ames, IA, would have the same middle initial as the Dan Adkins, but that would be one helluva coincidence, wouldn't it...?   hm

I also remember reading somewhere that some artists (back then, and possibly these days, too) had two signatures: a more stylized version they used to formally sign their work, and a workaday "John Hancock" used for endorsing their checks, etc. ...

Edited by jools&jim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
0