Bulls Eye Comics #11 (Chesler 1944) Large Piece out of FC - Auto NG? 0

[telerites]

I think this would most likely garner a NG if slabbed.  Other than the obvious flaw, it is pretty sound with supple pages but does have more than moderate on the covers as can be seen along with the piece missing.

 Would NG be correct?

Edited October 6, 2018 by telerites

[1950's war comics]

waaay better than NG 

at least a CGC 1.0 if not better IMO...

[telerites]

42 minutes ago, 1950's war comics said:

waaay better than NG 

at least a CGC 1.0 if not better IMO...

I thought they would consider it incomplete with such a large piece missing.  I thought I saw another GA book that was similar with a NG but it may have had other interior pieces out.   

Remaindered books get an NG which I guess would be a bit more of the cover gone.   

 

[FoggyNelson]

I think cgc will give this a grade‼️‼️? even if it is 0.5 or a 1.0 

but it is better than ?NG??‼️?

[comicjack]

you know i love that one at least 1.0 

[telerites]

1 hour ago, comicjack said:

you know i love that one at least 1.0 

I know, Jack 

I had my other copy graded - I think you saw it.  I really think I will send this one in - just to see how they grade it.  Probably not worth it with the chunk out but curiosity is begging me to.

 

[James J Johnson]

23 hours ago, 1950's war comics said:

waaay better than NG 

at least a CGC 1.0 if not better IMO...

Maybe even a 1.5. It's  2.5 or 3.0 without the piece considered (dependent upon the back cover). Let's not forget, there's an Action 1 graded 3.5 with a piece off one of the f.c.corners just about the same size as this. IMO, it's a 1.0, but in these very low grade ranges, unless incomplete, there's sometimes as fine a line between 1.0 and 1.5 on any particular grading as there sometimes is between 9.4 and 9.6.

[Lucky Baru]

A 1.0