Guess the CGC grade: Ghost Comics #2! 2 2

[Point Five]

No notes on the label. The bruised effect in the upper left corner is much worse in the scan than in hand. Off-white pages. Cheers!

 

[Spyder!]

4.5

[comicquant]

Looks like a 3.5 to me.  Awesome book!

[piper]

Is that foxing or water damage on back?

[timfinz]

Spoiler

3.5 IMHO

 

[Bomber-Bob]

I'm not good at grading books in this range. No major flaws, but very well read with stains. SInce CGC is so lenient in this range, I will say 4.0 . I hope this won't be another example of an overgraded CGC book.

[Point Five]

10 hours ago, piper said:

Is that foxing or water damage on back?

I guess I'd say it's a lovely potpourri of both. 

 

[ThothAmon]

4.0. 

[The Lions Den]

 

I like 4.5.

[creaturefan95]

I'm in the VG+ camp.

[marmat]

4.0, beautiful

[BakerFanOne]

Great classic book!  I would say 3.5 - 4.0ish but the back cover issues might bring it closer to 3.5.

[khoo75]

12 minutes ago, BakerFanOne said:

Great classic book!  I would say 3.5 - 4.0ish but the back cover issues might bring it closer to 3.5.

+1

[Point Five]

Cheers guys, will post the reveal tonight. 

 

 

[telerites]

Great book,Jon.  I am going with a CGC 5.0.  Outside of the BC flaws, it is a nice book and has good PQ.  

[thunsicker]

4.0 for me.  Too much going on with the back cover.  That said always nice to have the back cover be where the issues are.

[FoggyNelson]

I think it could bem5.0 cause front black cover looks so nice‼️‼️👍🆒🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

[Mystafo]

4.0/4.5 (shocking guess, huh)

[Cliff R.]

I nominate Point Five to host a daily thread "Guess The CGC Grade".

Best poker face I've ever seen. He's tipped his hand, though. 

7 hours ago, Point Five said:

I guess I'd say it's a lovely potpourri of both.  

He smilingly said lovely.  He likes the grade. 

I'm upping my guess from 3.5 to 4.0.

[1950's war comics]

Looks very good !  a CGC 4.0 maybe even 4.5 !