• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

The Crowley Pedigree Thread
1 1

97 posts in this topic

On 12/16/2021 at 4:04 PM, Straw-Man said:

cmj21.jpg

 

When I first saw the Wendell Crowley books before they came to market, my general comment to Bechara was: structurally perfect, look like they were never touched by human hands, but aged.  The Edgar Church (EC) copies often look touched, but are usually fresh and perfectly preserved.  

 

For me, it's sort of ridiculous to compare most so-called pedigrees to the EC books.  While I happen to think the EC copies often rank second to the Tom Reilly and Allentown books, there's no denying that the breadth and sheer number of consistently pristine fresh copies in the EC pedigree make it hard to argue there's any other pedigree that is comparable.  I'd also point out that designer comic books - or pedigrees - offer the seller marketing potential, hence, the number of questionable pedigrees.  

 

The Checking Copy stamp: it confirms the pedigree, and also makes the books feel "alive" in the approval process.  Having said that, this only extends to those copies where the stamp is well-placed.  A misplaced stamp ruins the image ... at least for me.    

 

Question:  it's no secret that Fawcett recycled myriad Mac Raboy images - like the one on the CMJ #21 above, which came from Master #38.  Thoughts on whether this diminishes the appeal of the recycled image book?  Not analogous, but my Mac OA pages that don't have paste-ups seem more "real" to me, even if they aren't any less expensive.  

 

   

   

 

Edited by LearnedHand
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/20/2021 at 8:31 PM, LearnedHand said:

 

When I first saw the Wendell Crowley books before they came to market, my general comment to Bechara was: structurally perfect, look like they were never touched by human hands, but aged.  The Edgar Church (EC) copies often look touched, but are usually fresh and perfectly preserved.  

 

For me, it's sort of ridiculous to compare most so-called pedigrees to the EC books.  While I happen to think the EC copies often rank second to the Tom Reilly and Allentown books, there's no denying that the breadth and sheer number of consistently pristine fresh copies in the EC pedigree make it hard to argue there's any other pedigree that is comparable.  I'd also point out that designer comic books - or pedigrees - offer the seller marketing potential, hence, the number of questionable pedigrees.  

 

The Checking Copy stamp: it confirms the pedigree, and also makes the books feel "alive" in the approval process.  Having said that, this only extends to those copies where the stamp is well-placed.  A misplaced stamp ruins the image ... at least for me.    

 

Question:  it's no secret that Fawcett recycled myriad Mac Raboy images - like the one on the CMJ #21 above, which came from Master #38.  Thoughts on whether this diminishes the appeal of the recycled image book?  Not analogous, but my Mac OA pages that don't have paste-ups seem more "real" to me, even if they aren't any less expensive.  

 

   

   

 

varies among the recycled; the jr. 21 is a good cover, plus the stamp appeal.  not a lesser book to me.  this one, tho', is not alot of book imo, the recylcled image just doesn't grab at all.

cmj59.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
1 1