Bart Allen Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 I was thinking recently as to what some undervalued Modern key comics may be - whether it be first appearances, early appearances, origin stories, iconic cover art, classic stories etc - and New X-Men #134 seemed to be exactly that, or am I simply being a bit too optimistic? It's a first appearance of Omega level mutant Quentin Quire: a potential Phoenix avatar - whilst on the Morrison run. Naturally, I know that Fantomex was a unique byproduct from the New X-Men run, given he was the major player in the Remender X-Force run etc. And of course all it takes is for fanboy Feige to make an announcement - which was seen it Eternals #1 and Marvel Super-Heroes #13, for example. What do you think? Link to post Share on other sites
ExNihilo Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 Ummm...who's Quentin Quire? Until some creator comes along and does something notable/worthwhile with a character, it's all a guessing game. sagekilz, Avi and PeterPark 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites
followtheleader Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 Still feel Fantomex is undervalued. Granted, it's not super hard to find and is fairly recent. Just see a lot of potential that is being wasted. Oddly enough, feels like Deadpool before he became hot (copies were a few bucks, but dirt cheap compared to recent history). Patrick BishopT and Bart Allen 2 Link to post Share on other sites
alewario Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 Also a great quote in there: "It's all fake and illusion. That's what cool is. That's what charisma is. That's what everything is." -- Quentin Quire Bart Allen 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Bart Allen Posted July 31, 2019 Author Share Posted July 31, 2019 On 7/30/2019 at 3:24 AM, followtheleader said: Still feel Fantomex is undervalued. Granted, it's not super hard to find and is fairly recent. Just see a lot of potential that is being wasted. Oddly enough, feels like Deadpool before he became hot (copies were a few bucks, but dirt cheap compared to recent history). Patrick How so? Link to post Share on other sites
Shoomanfoo Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 No not at all... Just no. Link to post Share on other sites
maraxusofkeld Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 I do think it is undervalued, but what may hurt the book is he is not on the cover. Link to post Share on other sites
Second Blight Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, maraxusofkeld said: I do think it is undervalued, but what may hurt the book is he is not on the cover. not being on a cover doesn't mean squat Edited August 2, 2019 by Second Blight Link to post Share on other sites
valiantman Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 21 minutes ago, Second Blight said: 1 hour ago, maraxusofkeld said: I do think it is undervalued, but what may hurt the book is he is not on the cover. not being on a cover doesn't mean squat Hulk #180 squat? Link to post Share on other sites
500Club Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 51 minutes ago, valiantman said: 1 hour ago, Second Blight said: 2 hours ago, maraxusofkeld said: I do think it is undervalued, but what may hurt the book is he is not on the cover. not being on a cover doesn't mean squat Hulk #180 squat? JO 134 squat? Link to post Share on other sites
valiantman Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 20 minutes ago, 500Club said: 1 hour ago, valiantman said: 1 hour ago, Second Blight said: 3 hours ago, maraxusofkeld said: I do think it is undervalued, but what may hurt the book is he is not on the cover. not being on a cover doesn't mean squat Hulk #180 squat? JO 134 squat? JO #134 would probably be squat if Darkseid appeared on the cover of JO #135 instead of not appearing on any cover for five months. Link to post Share on other sites
500Club Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, valiantman said: 27 minutes ago, 500Club said: 1 hour ago, valiantman said: 1 hour ago, Second Blight said: 3 hours ago, maraxusofkeld said: I do think it is undervalued, but what may hurt the book is he is not on the cover. not being on a cover doesn't mean squat Hulk #180 squat? JO 134 squat? JO #134 would probably be squat if Darkseid appeared on the cover of JO #135 instead of not appearing on any cover for five months. Yeah, probably. To me, the take home message is: there are no hard and fast rules. Link to post Share on other sites
Mr bla bla Posted August 6, 2019 Share Posted August 6, 2019 Jimmy 134 has serious upside JTLarsen 1 Link to post Share on other sites
maraxusofkeld Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 I think the Morrion New X-Men run is undervalued in general. There are many new X-Men/ mutants that appear that have been used in the subsequent years. JTLarsen 1 Link to post Share on other sites
500Club Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 15 hours ago, maraxusofkeld said: I think the Morrion New X-Men run is undervalued in general. There are many new X-Men/ mutants that appear that have been used in the subsequent years. Yeah, I agree. And, in regards to the OP, X-Men 134 isn't a 'key', per se, but as QQ continues to get used, it has the potential to become one. Link to post Share on other sites
ExNihilo Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 On 8/2/2019 at 9:33 AM, valiantman said: On 8/2/2019 at 9:10 AM, Second Blight said: On 8/2/2019 at 7:42 AM, maraxusofkeld said: I do think it is undervalued, but what may hurt the book is he is not on the cover. not being on a cover doesn't mean squat Hulk #180 squat? FF #48 squat JTLarsen 1 Link to post Share on other sites
divad Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 Is New X-Men #134 (1st Quentin Quire) an undervalued key? Not since someone decided to post this thread . . . BishopT, Bart Allen and maraxusofkeld 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Bart Allen Posted August 31, 2019 Author Share Posted August 31, 2019 (edited) On 8/7/2019 at 11:53 PM, divad said: Is New X-Men #134 (1st Quentin Quire) an undervalued key? Not since someone decided to post this thread . . . Wait what? How do you mean, divad? Edited August 31, 2019 by Bart Allen ygogolak 1 Link to post Share on other sites
divad Posted August 31, 2019 Share Posted August 31, 2019 (edited) Why pumpty-dumpty, of course . . . . Edited August 31, 2019 by divad ExNihilo and Bart Allen 2 Link to post Share on other sites
cbaileypacker Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 🤞🤞🤞 Bart Allen 1 Link to post Share on other sites