• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

The Great First Appearance Debate- Resolved???
1 1

171 posts in this topic

I will add this...the idea behind when a character first appears should be dependent upon when the comic was available to the public. If you have a book published in June of some year, with a character appearing for the first time ever, that is their first appearance.

If next month (July), you have a comic come out with a story that predates the story from the June issue (and features this new character), well this is still a second appearance. Yes, it may now be the first time the character is seen in whatever universe THEY exist but not the one we exist in. This should clear up any of the black suit costume debates for ole Spidey.

I mean, if Marvel puts out a comic next year about Galactus that occurs in the 1700's, well before his current first appearance in the Marvel continuity, does this become his first appearance? No. That is silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Web of Spider-Man 18. Here is a potential weird one. When I first read it I was so confused...where was this supposed Venom/Eddie Brock appearance. Wait...that female looking hand that pushes Parker at the end? 

Apparently this was later retconned to be Eddie/Venom. If anyone can inform me when and in what issue this was retconned I would love to know.

As is, I call it a first unknown appearance of Eddie/Venom. As an entity, the fact the symbiote possesses Eddie even when he is still Eddie means Venom is there but definitely not visually. Plus could be anyone’s hand. And in this case it did just look like a random persons hand. So there is my label but again, I’d like someone to confirm when and where event was confirmed to be Eddie/Venom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Constantine. Now there is a character with a messy first appearance.

Is it Swamp Thing 25, 37 or DC Sampler 3?

To my knowledge, no writer has ever come out and said “yes that one panel face in Swamp Thing 25 is Constantine.”  The fact that they look similar means nothing. This book is overvalued.

DC Sampler 3 is exactly that...a sampler! Thus it fits into my “first preview” appearance because we see a preview for an upcoming character.

Finally, Swamp Thing 37 showcases Constantine throughout. It is his first appearance. And that is the only designator that should be labelled for this issue. 

Edited by comicginger1789
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One collector with deep pockets could start selling Hulk 181 cheap and buying up all the 180s at ever higher prices.  Panic would set in and 181 would drop like a stone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kav said:

One collector with deep pockets could start selling Hulk 181 cheap and buying up all the 180s at ever higher prices.  Panic would set in and 181 would drop like a stone.

Haha definitely. The people will always decide the value. Hence why the correct answer to everything is “whatever the market decides”. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, comicginger1789 said:

First Unknown Appearance

Nice posts comicginger - thanks for taking the time to put them together. There's nothing wrong with trying to categorise things in my view, and yours is a decent attempt. It's a long debated subject as you pointed out, and many will say it is already 'resolved', but I personally like to hear new takes on things. Or even old takes from new people.

I'm not keen on 'First Unknown Appearance'. That sounds odd to me, in a misnomery kind of way (is that a word? It is now). How about 'First Undisclosed Appearance'?

I was going to suggest 'First Undisclosed / Character Known' but that would just be childish, in an acronymic kind of way (is that a word....?)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Get Marwood & I said:

 

I was going to suggest 'First Undisclosed / Character Known' but that would just be childish, in an acronymic kind of way (is that a word....?)

 

You are right, First Unknown Appearance is not the best. Because in some cases, with a character like Killer Croc, we know his name before we see his face. So he is not truly unknown in the fullest sense. I like you label!

 

ps I am fairly sure the words you used are not actually words but you were creative with the English language and in my classes I am all for that :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, comicginger1789 said:

You are right, First Unknown Appearance is not the best. Because in some cases, with a character like Killer Croc, we know his name before we see his face. So he is not truly unknown in the fullest sense. I like you label!

 

ps I am fairly sure the words you used are not actually words but you were creative with the English language and in my classes I am all for that :)

Given the suggested acronym you must have thought you were back at school :grin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, comicginger1789 said:

Recently, there has been a lot of discussion in the comic community surrounding first appearances. This discussion has prompted a lot of healthy (and some unhealthy) debate as well as drive interest in more and more comics.

As an English teacher, the thing that I feel is holding people up is the terminology behind it all. Surely there must be a way to classify all of these appearances in a way that is clear, concise and can accurately account for all of the variations that currently exist. So without further ado, here is my attempt to classify first appearances of characters.

 

First Prototype Appearance

A prototype appearance is the lowest level of first appearance. Perhaps it is showcasing a character in development or it shows a character who later is fleshed out into a well known character. The quickest examples here that come to mind are Foom #2 (first Wolverine prototype) and Marvel Age #12 (first black suit Spider-Man). These are just images of the characters, there is no story involvement and in these cases, the final design for the character is not ethe same one that appears later in stories.

 

First Preview Appearance

This label is denoted to an appearance of a character in something like a comic magazine or even as an ad in a comic book. In these cases, it is the actual character. They are beyond a prototype, it is character as it is intended to appear when it appears for the first time. Books like Malibu Sun #13 (not a comic) or Gobbledygook #1 (an ad in a comic book) fit this label.

 

A book like DC Comics Presents #26 should NOT be labelled a preview in any way. Within, is a full on story depicting the first appearance of the New Teen Titans. In New Teen Titans #1, the events from DCCP #26 have already happened. Granted, it is not their book they appear in but back in the day, comic had multiple stories with multiple characters. This technically was a preview, sure, but to me it does not fit my definition which is showing a character in a non comic or as an ad. DCCP #26 is first appearance of New Teen Titans. New Teen Titans #1 is first cover appearance, second appearance of New Teen Titans.

 

First Unknown Appearance

I do not like the term “cameo”. To me, a cameo is a minor role of a character that is known outside of their regular series or story. For example, when Spidey shows up in Silver Surfer #14, he is a well known and making a cameo appearance. A character appearing for the first time is not a cameo to me.

 Calling the first panel appearance of a character a cameo implies we won’t see them again, at least not often. However, with a lot of these currently labelled cameo appearances, we do get a panel or more and the character becomes very much involved in the next couple issues and subsequent issues beyond.

 So I am proposing a change in terminology here. Woah. You can do that? Yup, and I am. Allow me to try to explain the “first unknown appearance”. This label is designated to characters that we see but not enough to get a sense of their appearance (hence, the unknown part). Perhaps it is a dark face in a trenchcoat (think Killer Croc in Batman #357…which is currently his first full appearance but I strongly disagree with that). This should be first unknown appearance. Sure, we know his name but we don’t have a face to that name. We don’t know is “full appearance”, we cannot accurately describe him. His appearance is unknown to us. Sure, we can describe his body but you could put anybody in that trenchcoat...we need the face. Similarly, in Amazing Spider-Man #298, we see a dark a dark shadow and a hand. It is later clear this is Venom but we don’t get a full sense what he looks like. Thus, these are first unknown appearances.

 First Appearance

My definition for first appearance is simple and answers the following question: Do we see enough of the character to visually know who they are? If the answer is yes, then it is a first appearance. Hulk #180 features a full panel of Wolverine. We clearly see him and we know who he is but most importantly, what he looks like. In Amazing Spider-Man #299, we see Venom in full at the end. We can now identify this character, thus it is his first appearance. In Jimmy Olsen #134, we can clearly see Darkseid’s face on a monitor. It may not be a full body shot, but it is enough to know if we see it again (with a body drawn) we know “hey, that’s Darkseid!”. With Killer Croc, we do not get that until Detective Comics #524…making Detective #523 and Batman #357 “unknown appearances”, first and second respectively. 

A character who first appears in a book and plays a major role throughout will only ever be classified as a first appearance. They appear for the first time, clearly, and there is no argument. Amazing Spider-Man #129 is the first appearance of the Punisher. No debate. His first appearance is easily discernable, there is nothing prior to be noted and subsequent appearances are easy to note.  

First Full Appearance

This label is denoted to a character who has already appeared before visually but in less than 5 panels. For example, Wolverine appears in less than five panels in Hulk #180. That comic would have a label as being his “first appearance”. Hulk #181 would be labelled “Second appearance, first full appearance. Hulk #182 would simply be “Third appearance of Wolverine”.

 Some further examples: 

Amazing Spider-Man #299 is “first appearance of Venom”. Issue #300 is “Second appearance, first full appearance of Venom.”  

Jimmy Olsen #134 is “first appearance of Darkseid”. Forever People #1 is “second appearance, first full appearance of Darkseid”.

Amazing Fantasy #15 is "first appearance of Spider-Man". No other notation means it is definitive 

 

First Cover Appearance

This last label is reserved for the first time a character appears on a cover. This label is SEPARATE from appearances in continuity and comes about largely due to the fact that you have had (in recent years) variant covers which feature a character to come but the story itself does not contain the character whatsoever. It is simply the first time the character appears on the cover.

So, for a standard book like ASM #129, it should be labelled “first appearance and first cover appearance of Punisher.” If a character has appeared prior in a story but not on a cover, the first time they are on the cover gets labelled. No matter how small. A head, a face, a full on glorious action shot.

Amazing Spider-Man #315 is first cover appearance of Venom (just a head but by my definition, still can be noted as a first cover appearance)

Another example. Avengers #195 features the first appearance of Taskmaster. He is fully shown on the final page. This comic will be labelled hi first appearance. Issue #196 features him on the cover and for more than 5 panels, thus it is his “second appearance, first full appearance and first cover appearance”.

A final example. Ronin first appeared on a variant cover only of New Avengers #1. He is there but nowhere in the story. This is his first cover appearance. In New Avengers #11, he appears for the first time in the story and on the cover. This should be labelled as his “first appearance”.

 

The Messy Stuff

Now, a couple of things muddy the waters on my labelling. The biggest is Sgt. Rock. So currently, GI Combat #68 is labelled as a “Sgt Rock prototype”. Now, it is my understanding that even though this character is not fully fleshed out, we get an origin tale for a soldier called “The Rock”. My understanding is that this origin is later attached to Sgt. Rock. So it is the same character all along, even if the writers/artists did not know 100% what they were doing. For me, that means it is the first appearance. He evolves into Sgt. Rock and the fact they keep his origin part of his story (as well as his other currently labelled “prototype” appearances which should just be subsequent appearances). The name changes by adding a rank…that is pretty much it.

 

A second one that could cause problems but doesn’t seem to too much is Rocket Raccoon. In Marvel Preview #7, the character is called Rocky Raccoon. However, in Hulk #271, we get Rocket. It is explained in the issue though that Rocky was short for Rocket. So it’s the same character. Simple.

 

 

Will This Matter?

Will this matter to anyone? Maybe, and maybe not. I just found it an interesting topic to flesh out. I think these labels would be best suited for CGC to adapt and terminology for collector’s to use. It seems simple to me. Maybe a lot of writing which some people complain about as is (wanting less label and more focus drawn to the comic). 

 

As for what people want to spend their money on, that is a different opinion. For me, the cover of Hulk #181 will always, hands down I dare anyone to argue against it, be the superior looking cover. So why can’t it be more valuable? Why does the first appearance have to be the most expensive when the second appearance and first full appearance and first cover appearance is amazing.

 Same goes for ASM #300. Iconic cover, iconic moment in the title’s history and looks so much better than #299.

 Same for Avengers #196 over #195. And many others.

 

Your Thoughts?

Thank you for your time reading this. I am 100% sure there are examples out there that do not fit into my labels. I welcome all examples. This is a starting point that I am hoping we can build on. I am hoping people can find a book that does not work for my labels so that we can have some discussion! I don't have aspirations of changing anything here but I am interested in trying to find a way to word all of these different appearances that is at least a little more clear. 

This is really good and really thought out.

How would you determine which one would be the most valuable appearance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, theCapraAegagrus said:

I mean, CGC's label does state, "1st appearance of Wolverine..." on the label of IH180.

Not sure what the beef is.

Thor: The Dark World is The Collector's 1st appearance. It's a cameo - but he appears for the first time.

Exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, kav said:

One collector with deep pockets could start selling Hulk 181 cheap and buying up all the 180s at ever higher prices.  Panic would set in and 181 would drop like a stone.

uh oh Kav is on to my scheme... :makepoint::sumo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Hollywood1892 said:

This is really good and really thought out.

How would you determine which one would be the most valuable appearance?

The market. The demand and supply determine the value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done, I like this. I agree the “unknown” designation could be improved, but I don’t have a replacement. It is slightly misleading in the example of Killer Croc, but perfectly suited to Knull (Thor God of Thunder 6 (2013) vs Venom 3 (2018).)

What about a previews comic that features actual story to be seen in an upcoming 1st appearance issue? I’m thinking of Dark Horse’s Ghost.

Comics Greatest World Week 3 is credited with 1st appearance, yet the Comics Greatest World Sourcebook released earlier shows an entire story page from Aforementioned book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, comicginger1789 said:

If anything, kids are silent and mesmerized by how many streaks they are hitting on Snapchat....

I have no idea what that means.

And I'm glad.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, comicginger1789 said:

Surprisingly, not as commonly heard as one might think. If anything, kids are silent and mesmerized by how many streaks they are hitting on Snapchat....

what the heck is a streak on Snapchat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
1 1