PGM Fantastic Four #51 0

[aKyleT]

Has a half inch tear at the bottom of the page through about 1/3 of the interior. 

[WPPJames]

2.0? I hate being the first to post a PGM as I usually ending up looking foolish later.

Tear thru 1/3 of interior pages is a lot. Eye test on covers a beautiful book. But again interior page tears?

[TSwift25]

I have a hard time seeing the tear in the interior photo. Seems VG- range to me. 3.5 

[aKyleT]

4 minutes ago, WPPJames said:

2.0? I hate being the first to post a PGM as I usually ending up looking foolish later.

Tear thru 1/3 of interior pages is a lot. Eye test on covers a beautiful book. But again interior page tears?

Looking at it again and being precise, it's just 4 pages not a third. Still not an ideal thing of course. 

[The Lions Den]

1 minute ago, aKyleT said:

Looking at it again and being precise, it's just 4 pages not a third. Still not an ideal thing of course. 

Could still be in the VG range...

[WPPJames]

Just now, aKyleT said:

Looking at it again and being precise, it's just 4 pages not a third. Still not an ideal thing of course. 

Jacking my estimate up to a 2.5/3.0 now. It's a very nice book.

[theCapraAegagrus]

3.5 IMO.

[kav]

On 9/11/2019 at 7:37 PM, WPPJames said:

2.0? I hate being the first to post a PGM as I usually ending up looking foolish later.

Tear thru 1/3 of interior pages is a lot. Eye test on covers a beautiful book. But again interior page tears?

wtf 2.0?  A 2.0 is a really ragged almost uncollectible looking book!!  I see a 4.5 here folks.

[Deadpoolica]

4.0

[WolverineX]

3.5- 4.0