• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Color Breaking Spine Tick Grade Question
1 1

13 posts in this topic

Hey guys, I recently purchased a book that has 1 color breaking spine tick and was said to be “a 9.8 candidate” after a press. I’ve been reading through the previous threads about color breaking spine ticks and it seems that if that is the only defect of the book, it could be a 9.8 since it isn't perfect. Some threads have said a press makes color breaking ticks look worse.

It’d really help if I got some opinions on what the potential grading of this book could be. Pictures are attached. (The tick is circled in the last picture)

Thanks

D6E403E6-5C6E-482A-AA4B-A865570BFB9B.jpeg

4C61BB9B-BC75-4670-B06A-1685CFA4BAF7.jpeg

817DC050-24EF-4D68-B7D2-AD89CB006C6C.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome To The Boards!!!

I cannot help with your pressing question, however, IMO...

If the book is perfect in every other way and that color breaking spine tick is the only defect IMO that book will be a VF/NM 9.0 MAX.

Typically and by the grading standards a color breaking spine tick will not garner a grade higher VF+ 8.5.

The first mention of stress lines comes in...NM 9.4

NM+ 9.6 -  no creases, bends, or color break.

NM 9.4 - Almost no stress lines

NM- 9.2 -  Almost no stress lines

VF/NM 9.0 - A very minor accumulation of stress lines may be present if they are nearly imperceptible

VF 8.0 - Very slight staple tears and a few almost insignificant stress lines may be present

How does/will CGC view that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CGC's internal grading standard clearly deviates from that one in this regard. There are occasional books that have a single color break and no other flaws that manage to come back with a 9.6. More frequently, I'd consider a book with one such tick and no other issues at all to be a likely 9.2/9.4 candidate (note of course that books with a color break on the spine often have other defects). Regardless, it definitely does not hard cap the grade at 9.0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a big difference between mild spine ticks and color-breaking spine ticks.  It is my experience that you can get a 9.8 with a few light spine ticks, as long as they are subtle and definitely do not break color.  Like maybe 3 or so.  If you have more light ticks, probably drops to a 9.6.  If even one tick breaks color, it will be 9.6 or below, depending on how many, how severe, other defects, etc.  I agree that the defect in the photo is significantly more than a spine tick, a substantial crease.

I'm not a fan of the CGC grading scale.  Talk about a lack of specifics, almost the definition of vague.  Purposely vague.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2020 at 5:49 PM, Parm10 said:

Hey guys, I recently purchased a book that has 1 color breaking spine tick and was said to be “a 9.8 candidate” after a press. I’ve been reading through the previous threads about color breaking spine ticks and it seems that if that is the only defect of the book, it could be a 9.8 since it isn't perfect. Some threads have said a press makes color breaking ticks look worse.

It’d really help if I got some opinions on what the potential grading of this book could be. Pictures are attached. (The tick is circled in the last picture)

Thanks

 

 

They lied. For a 9.8 the ONLY defects found on it have to be from manufacturing. Basically you can't have flaws on it, hence why its the grade that has become the gold standard. A spine tick/crease show the comic was handled or read. This is more like a 9.4, press or no press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this topic, https://www.cgccomics.com/boards/topic/470841-does-grading-depend-on-what-mood-a-grader-is-in/#comments

I found an Adventure Comics 332 CGC graded at 9.2 with 7 spine ticks and an iffy corner as well. The 9.2 GPA of that issue is north of 1k dollars. Dunno what the lower GPAs are worth (and therefore the size of the 'gift' the seller received from CGC as a result of that grade instead of a lower one) but with that many faults how on Earth that issue got a 9.2 is beyond me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Will78 said:

$1,000 for a 9.2 of that crappy book? People are stupid :facepalm:

Only 3 higher copies are known to exist none of which have ever come up for sale. When a 9.2 becomes available it seems bids go crazy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why people say it's a 9.0 with a color break, you can have a color break and get a 9.6, I have some and have seen many. I've also seen 9.8's with color breaks but they are much older books, I think they would be a bit more strict as it's still a fairly new book.

 

This one is pretty big though, if it was half the size I'd say you have a good shot at a 9.6 but maybe a 9.2-9.4 with that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, IbukiLord said:

Not sure why people say it's a 9.0 with a color break, you can have a color break and get a 9.6, I have some and have seen many. I've also seen 9.8's with color breaks but they are much older books, I think they would be a bit more strict as it's still a fairly new book.

This is true, and it constantly frustrates me.  It's like a "conditional" condition.  "It's a 9.6 due to it's age, would probably be a 9.0 if it was a modern book."  The grade standards shouldn't change for anything.  That's the definition of "standards".  Everything is a 10.0 with a big IF following that - if it didn't have creases, if it wasn't water stained, if it wasn't read a million times.

Like adjusting for the age of something.  If 8.0 for a Golden Age book is hard to attain, so be it.  It's an 8.0, top of the line, very expensive, since it's hard to get over 8.0.  Let's not just call it a 9.0 because it's a Golden Age, giving allowances for whatever defects it has.  Even in Overstreet describing 9.4 Near Mint, they state: bindery tears must be 1/16" or less on Silver Age or later, Golden Age up to 1/4" ok.  What????  It is what it is, not what you want it to be.  Just because something doesn't exist in super-high grades, doesn't mean we should lower the standards to meet it.  Like grading on a curve - whoever invented that left us a hot mess.

Edited by Lightning55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
1 1