• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Mount Rushmore of Comic Artists
4 4

196 posts in this topic

8 minutes ago, THE_BEYONDER said:

Thank you.  This brought a tear to my eye.
His run on Adventure and World's Finest is some of the best comic work ever done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never could come to like Curt Swan's art.

It really does matter WHEN you're introduced to the artist. If you were a Superman fan as a kid you're going to have an emotional attachment.

I couldn't get over how wide Superman's waist always was. As someone who followed bodybuilding, his Supes just wasn't as virile enough for me.

Edited by VintageComics
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wisbyron said:

Yeah, it's all subjective regardless of majority view. As I said earlier, Al Milgrom's Hulk stands out to be because I vividly remember buying those issues at 7-11 when I was 7 years old and being captivated by them. I'm sure many people have similar experiences that lends to their appreciation of an individual artist. I've always found Byrne really bland and not that captivating. 

Funny thing about Milgrom is that I hated his work until I’d seen some of his early projects that impressed me. His appeal suffered when he started doing every other cover and book when Marvel needed deadlines met and everything he did started to look rushed. Granted, the right inker can make heavy pencils and roughs into a masterpiece, which is where I place Byrne’s later work too. Loved his bronze age stuff but it too looked like he was no longer so enthusiastic about some things into the coppers and moderns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swan was the definitive Superman artist in my eyes but his “simple” style probably wouldn’t last too long after guys like Kneel Atoms came along and started influencing more artists styles that were more appealing to collectors. Example: the cover to Superman 233 fetches a premium price because of the Adams cover even though the interior art by Swan and Murphy Anderson looks fantastic. I don’t think it gets the same attention had they done the cover.

05051108-1379-4A70-A9BD-F4CA60A3DFA5.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you were to make an actual Mt. Comicmore IRL, you would need more than just the four spots, at least two or three more.  And you couldn't limit it to just artists because there is no way you could leave off Stan 'the man' Lee on something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I think the majority of fandom can be fickle and it's just like a person who only listens to one genre of music. I think you can enjoy Neal Adams and Curt Swan and neither have to compete with each other. I think you can dig 70s' Bronze Age Marvel books and critically acclaimed Fantagraphics books; but it's always the one-or-the-other thinking that limits the medium. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, VintageComics said:

I never could come to like Curt Swan's art.

It really does matter WHEN you're introduced to the artist. If you were a Superman fan as a kid you're going to have an emotional attachment.

I couldn't get over how wide Superman's waist always was. As someone who followed bodybuilding, his Supes just wasn't as virile enough for me.

This is right on. I think maybe Kirby would be the only to transcend any age divide. 

As far as the wide waist thing goes, you're probably aware bodybuilding was in its infancy in those days. The "V shape" wasn't really popularized before the mid 60's when Mr. Olympia started. The physical depictions were a reflection of the times. One of the biggest changes in physical depiction from time of creation may have been Flash. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VintageComics said:

I couldn't get over how wide Superman's waist always was. As someone who followed bodybuilding, his Supes just wasn't as virile enough for me.

Body shaming!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MGsimba77 said:

This is right on. I think maybe Kirby would be the only to transcend any age divide. 

Bingo.

Kirby was the person I thought of as well that transcended all eras and emotional attachment.

4 minutes ago, MGsimba77 said:

As far as the wide waist thing goes, you're probably aware bodybuilding was in its infancy in those days. The "V shape" wasn't really popularized before the mid 60's when Mr. Olympia started. The physical depictions were a reflection of the times. One of the biggest changes in physical depiction from time of creation may have been Flash. 

That totally makes sense.

I was born in 1970 and didn't start following until the late 1970's while I was in grade school so that would have been as Arnold, Sergio Olivia etc were starting to peak.

Flash is a great example as well.

3 STARS! :applause:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, s-man said:

If you were to make an actual Mt. Comicmore IRL, you would need more than just the four spots, at least two or three more.  And you couldn't limit it to just artists because there is no way you could leave off Stan 'the man' Lee on something like that.

Well you would probably need more than 4 realistically on a real Mount Rushmore and the 4 selected probably aren't the top 4 anyway.  Not that I'll go into it more than that for obvious reasons.  That said the point is you have to arbitrarily choose a number of faces for your mountain and have to arbitrarily choose which faces.  For this thought exercise it's 4 faces and it's artists.  Give it a go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thunsicker said:

Well you would probably need more than 4 realistically on a real Mount Rushmore and the 4 selected probably aren't the top 4 anyway.  Not that I'll go into it more than that for obvious reasons.  That said the point is you have to arbitrarily choose a number of faces for your mountain and have to arbitrarily choose which faces.  For this thought exercise it's 4 faces and it's artists.  Give it a go!

I've tried over the last few hours and its impossible because past Kirby all others are really up to individual tastes.  Maybe it should be Mt. Kirby and leave it at that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will this Mt Rushmore have a secret chamber that leads to the declaration of independence and gold and stuff?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That depends; who has access to the secret chamber? If there's a specific sect of us who are part of this inner circle I would like to be considered for inclusion. We can have the chamber door be at the Mt Rushmore of letterers, with the entrance panel right below the sculpture of Artie Simek. (Joe Rosen would just be too obvious)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wisbyron said:

That depends; who has access to the secret chamber? If there's a specific sect of us who are part of this inner circle I would like to be considered for inclusion. We can have the chamber door be at the Mt Rushmore of letterers, with the entrance panel right below the sculpture of Artie Simek. (Joe Rosen would just be too obvious)

Sorry it will be determined by who can solve all the puzzles left behind by the founding fathers of comic art.  Like a secret chamber will be discovered in the original Marvel and DC offices that have a map that can only be read by UV light and a mass spectrometer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/9/2020 at 8:58 PM, PopKulture said:

I was just asking elsewhere if you can still invoke the concept of Mount Rushmore? If so, this is my Rushmore of comic artists. Now, these aren't necessarily my favorites, although I do love them all. I am trying to be a little objective about it:

Jack Kirby - nobody comes close in sheer output and influence. Utterly dynamic and a great storyteller. An irresistible force. 

Neal Adams - the greatest delineator ever. Probably the second most influential after Kirby. Do you remember the first time you saw one of Adams' faces, in all its expressive and realistic glory?

Will Eisner - the godfather. Probably the best storyteller ever in comics, and an amazing draftsman. Influential as an artist, art director, editor, studio head...

Carl Barks - we have to remember: the overwhelming majority of comics didn't feature superheroes! He's the most gifted artist, cartoonist, draftsman and storyteller to work outside the narrower world of the men-in-tights. A sheer delight.  

So, what did I get wrong?  :nyah:

Very solid list. I'm not a Neal Adams guy, so I'd say

Barks

Kirby

Eisner

and if we're allowing strip artists, Charles Schulz.

My PERSONAL list would be Kirby, Barks, Walt Kelly, and Los Bros (I'm sneaking in two for one!)

Edited by F For Fake
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For sheer importance and also based on value of #1 books it would be
Shuster (superman)
Whoever bob kane got to draw batman (rushmore face would be a blank)
Ditko (spider man)
Kirby (Cap)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
4 4