Journey into mystery 86 0

[NotThisAccount17]

Hello, I recently purchased JIM 86 in a CGC slab. I understand that JIM 85 is the first cameo appearance of Odin. However, JIM 86 is recognized as the first full appearance of Odin. I was wondering why CGC puts “second appearance of Odin” on JIM 86 slabs instead of “first full appearance” as it does in almost every other scenario I have seen where there is a cameo and first full appearance. Thank you!

[NotThisAccount17]

7 hours ago, Satan Stole My Lunch Money said:

Why does it matter?

Good question. If Hulk 181 said “2nd appearance” instead of “1st full appearance” do you think that would matter? I do.

[BuscemasAvengers]

Let's hope it doesn't come down to a competition between which characters are favored over others when identifying appearances.  What are some of the other notations you've seen which counter the Odin notation?