PKJ Posted April 2, 2021 Share Posted April 2, 2021 Why in the world is the Thing covered on the new Labels? I like the new labels personally but would also want to see all 4 of them. MGsimba77 and KirbyJack 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drmanhattanite Posted April 2, 2021 Share Posted April 2, 2021 4 hours ago, marmat said: Still going strong 9.4 $138000 8.5 $54000 Insane growth. On track to surpass X-Men 1 at this rate InfantTerrible, Hollywood1892 and PKJ 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Lou 14 Posted April 2, 2021 Share Posted April 2, 2021 20 minutes ago, PKJ said: Why in the world is the Thing covered on the new Labels? I like the new labels personally but would also want to see all 4 of them. Yeah, it's really poorly done. PKJ and KirbyJack 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mmehdy Posted April 2, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted April 2, 2021 5 hours ago, marmat said: Still going strong 9.4 $138000 8.5 $54000 amazing, and I bought it on the newsstand for 12cents...man those were the days MGsimba77, HighVoltage, Dave2739 and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Sweet Lou 14 Posted April 3, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted April 3, 2021 31 minutes ago, Mmehdy said: amazing, and I bought it on the newsstand for 12cents...man those were the days I bought my 9.0 for $28,500 in 2019 ... man those were the days! MGsimba77, InfantTerrible, KCOComics and 6 others 2 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aman619 Posted April 3, 2021 Share Posted April 3, 2021 I remember when the first 9.4s sold for 20K and I thought it was nutty, oops. MGsimba77 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post KirbyJack Posted April 3, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted April 3, 2021 I once wrote a letter ranting that the buyer of the White Mountain Fantastic Four 1 overpaid. Back in the 1990s. It got published. Hollywood1892, KCOComics, Spaceguy and 2 others 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drmanhattanite Posted April 3, 2021 Share Posted April 3, 2021 2 hours ago, KirbyJack said: I once wrote a letter ranting that the buyer of the White Mountain Fantastic Four 1 overpaid. Back in the 1990s. It got published. Wonder what the mythical FF1 9.6 would sell for..I'd say milli's KirbyJack and KCOComics 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisco37 Posted April 3, 2021 Share Posted April 3, 2021 It would have to be a million dollar book (even before the current insanity). And, it’s not a myth. It’s real and it’s spectacular. It was a legit 9.6 when I saw it. KCOComics, KirbyJack and MGsimba77 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mmehdy Posted April 3, 2021 Share Posted April 3, 2021 1 hour ago, drmanhattanite said: Wonder what the mythical FF1 9.6 would sell for..I'd say milli's I think so for now, if as above it is a real 9.6 with that white cover..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drmanhattanite Posted April 4, 2021 Share Posted April 4, 2021 6 hours ago, chrisco37 said: It would have to be a million dollar book (even before the current insanity). And, it’s not a myth. It’s real and it’s spectacular. It was a legit 9.6 when I saw it. We need pics!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisco37 Posted April 4, 2021 Share Posted April 4, 2021 18 minutes ago, drmanhattanite said: We need pics!! There’s a pic floating around somewhere in cyberspace of me & that book. Probably a pic somewhere in the forum archives of the book itself. Not sure if Doug still owns it or not. Maybe Brulato has it now. I don’t know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post MGsimba77 Posted April 4, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted April 4, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, chrisco37 said: There’s a pic floating around somewhere in cyberspace of me & that book. Probably a pic somewhere in the forum archives of the book itself. Not sure if Doug still owns it or not. Maybe Brulato has it now. I don’t know. https://scoop.previewsworld.com/Home/4/1/73/1014?articleID=69773 Edited April 4, 2021 by MGsimba77 KirbyJack, Pantodude, drmanhattanite and 4 others 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aman619 Posted April 4, 2021 Share Posted April 4, 2021 there are 2 9.6s... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGsimba77 Posted April 4, 2021 Share Posted April 4, 2021 I think the other 9.6 is an OW. Paging @Captain Tripps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drummy Posted April 4, 2021 Share Posted April 4, 2021 I remember a thousand years ago when Doug S. supposedly asked CGC for a 'page quality review' of his FF #1 9.6, and *voila!* the book went from 9.6 ow to 9.6 wp. Could be the same copy? Anyway, people were a little steamed that the high roller could ask CGC for favors without a full re-grading. D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGsimba77 Posted April 4, 2021 Share Posted April 4, 2021 52 minutes ago, Drummy said: I remember a thousand years ago when Doug S. supposedly asked CGC for a 'page quality review' of his FF #1 9.6, and *voila!* the book went from 9.6 ow to 9.6 wp. Could be the same copy? Anyway, people were a little steamed that the high roller could ask CGC for favors without a full re-grading. D Okay so that means it was reholdered then resubmitted for PQ review? It had to have been in one of the original slabs with a cert # that low or not? KirbyJack 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Lou 14 Posted April 4, 2021 Share Posted April 4, 2021 2 hours ago, MGsimba77 said: Okay so that means it was reholdered then resubmitted for PQ review? It had to have been in one of the original slabs with a cert # that low or not? Something isn't right ... that number can't be looked up in the CGC verification database. https://www.cgccomics.com/certlookup/0000003001/ MGsimba77 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGsimba77 Posted April 4, 2021 Share Posted April 4, 2021 1 hour ago, Sweet Lou 14 said: Something isn't right ... that number can't be looked up in the CGC verification database. https://www.cgccomics.com/certlookup/0000003001/ Probably has something to do with it being reviewed by cgc. I've had two slabs where the cert was unsearchable. They showed up after calling cgc. I guess some cert #s slip through the cracks. I suspect this masterpiece was originally graded around 1999 2000? What I'm really wondering is if there's actually two 9.6s or is that a mistake due to the page review??? Apparantly there were a few more careful owners of FF5 than FF1 according to the census. I suppose It would make sense since it was about 8 months between release dates. Both these books are so...godly...holy...glorious...drool worthy...you name it‼ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
