Post your suggestions for a "forum guidelines" post to be stickied at the top.

[MutantKeys]

[divad]

I'd like to suggest that posting a competing WTB post on the same day is a no-no.

 

Perhaps for the same book, but certainly not for an entire freakin' title . . . Obviously it's not going anywhere . . .

[nearmint]

I'd like to suggest that posting a competing WTB post on the same day is a no-no.

 

Perhaps for the same book, but certainly not for an entire freakin' title . . . Obviously it's not going anywhere . . .

 

Who said anything about the whole title? I wouldn't have mentioned it if the copycats had been looking for different issues. Both were asking for books within the range I was looking for. One has since deleted his post.

 

Not a big deal, really. Just a mild frustration near the end of a long week at work.

[Darrell F]

thedude said he would be interested in any you did not buy. I don't see the problem with that as long as you get first pick.

[divad]

who could have a problem with 'thedude"?

[nearmint]

I don't have a problem with thedude, and we've PM'd about it. I was just looking at it from the POV of a seller who sees posts from three different guys looking for Actions, and uses the situation to create an auction atmosphere and pit us against each other.

[thedude]

I don't have a problem with thedude, and we've PM'd about it. I was just looking at it from the POV of a seller who sees posts from three different guys looking for Actions, and uses the situation to create an auction atmosphere and pit us against each other.

 

all is good, the dude abides,

 

[nearmint]

I don't have a problem with thedude, and we've PM'd about it. I was just looking at it from the POV of a seller who sees posts from three different guys looking for Actions, and uses the situation to create an auction atmosphere and pit us against each other.

 

all is good, the dude abides,

 

 

So, dude, that Action #44 for sale?

[thedude]

I don't have a problem with thedude, and we've PM'd about it. I was just looking at it from the POV of a seller who sees posts from three different guys looking for Actions, and uses the situation to create an auction atmosphere and pit us against each other.

 

all is good, the dude abides,

 

 

So, dude, that Action #44 for sale?

 

I'd love to help you out Jeff, but if I sold my #44 , then I'd need 10 books instead of 9 in my #40-#50 run, but you know your first in line for it if I upgrade or decide to sell all my books and go join the coinees.

 

...join the coinees

[nearmint]

I don't have a problem with thedude, and we've PM'd about it. I was just looking at it from the POV of a seller who sees posts from three different guys looking for Actions, and uses the situation to create an auction atmosphere and pit us against each other.

 

all is good, the dude abides,

 

 

So, dude, that Action #44 for sale?

 

I'd love to help you out Jeff, but if I sold my #44 , then I'd need 10 books instead of 9 in my #40-#50 run, but you know your first in line for it if I upgrade or decide to sell all my books and go join the coinees.

 

...join the coinees

 

Not even for ONE MIIILLLLLIIIOOON DOLLARS??!

[thedude]

I don't have a problem with thedude, and we've PM'd about it. I was just looking at it from the POV of a seller who sees posts from three different guys looking for Actions, and uses the situation to create an auction atmosphere and pit us against each other.

 

all is good, the dude abides,

 

 

So, dude, that Action #44 for sale?

 

I'd love to help you out Jeff, but if I sold my #44 , then I'd need 10 books instead of 9 in my #40-#50 run, but you know your first in line for it if I upgrade or decide to sell all my books and go join the coinees.

 

...join the coinees

 

Not even for ONE MIIILLLLLIIIOOON DOLLARS??!

 

 

here's ya one here.

[SuperBird]

I'd like to suggest that posting a competing WTB post on the same day is a no-no.

 

Perhaps for the same book, but certainly not for an entire freakin' title . . . Obviously it's not going anywhere . . .

 

Who said anything about the whole title? I wouldn't have mentioned it if the copycats had been looking for different issues. Both were asking for books within the range I was looking for. One has since deleted his post.

 

Not a big deal, really. Just a mild frustration near the end of a long week at work.

 

Mine was a joke, after I saw Dude's, and has since been deleted. I apologize.

[nearmint]

No need to apologize, Matt. I've actually had a few interesting PMs. All is well in the world of Action Comics.

 

By the way, Rob Hughes at Archangels has an Action #33 CGC 5.0. Nice book, but the chip out of the bottom right corner scared me off. Nice color on it, though. It's up for grabs!

[divad]

I don't have a problem with thedude, and we've PM'd about it. I was just looking at it from the POV of a seller who sees posts from three different guys looking for Actions, and uses the situation to create an auction atmosphere and pit us against each other.

 

Jeff,

I wasn't replying to you, but that's cool . . . thedude abides

-David

[divad]

all is good, the dude abides,

 

 

[Forbush-Man]

Start each new thread with "WTB" or "WTS", so you know before you even click the thread wether it's a buying or selling thread.

[joe_collector]

How about a ruling on all these multiple post artists, who dedicate a separate thread for each individual book?

[divad]

How about a ruling on all these multiple post artists, who dedicate a separate thread for each individual book?

 

Some books warrant a separate thread, others do not . . . I think the current "real estate" limitations work

[joe_collector]

Some books warrant a separate thread, others do not . . .

 

Yeah, and who decides that?

[divad]

Some books warrant a separate thread, others do not . . .

 

Yeah, and who decides that?

 

Why . . . he who hath the bounty, of course . . .