• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

CardiacKid1

Member
  • Posts

    440
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Journal Entries posted by CardiacKid1

  1. CardiacKid1
    A 34-year journey that is finally complete.
    We all have that special comic book in our collection, the one which means a little more to us than the rest. For me, it is my Avengers #1. It has been in my collection since 1979 and with your permission, I'd like to tell its story here. But first, I need to give you a little background. In a lot of ways, I'm going to sound like an old-timer now -- mainly because I am -- so I apologize in advance for that, But I can't convey what the book means to me without explaining the context in which I first obtained it.
    You young folks should know that before eBay, before e-mail and before the Internet, we collectors bought comics mainly in ways that would be foreign to most collectors today.
    When I first started collecting, in the 1970's, it would not be unusual to find some pretty decent comics at yard sales, flea markets or advertised in local newspapers for sale as a collection -- cheap. My mother owned an antique store in the late 70's and would sometimes hear that one of her customers was selling off a son's old and discarded comic book collection. I remember my mom putting me touch with one woman in particular, whose son had amassed a pretty big collection of DC's from the '60's and early '70's, including a really nice copy of Green Lantern 76. A buddy and I pooled our money -- $75.00, which was lot to us in those days -- and we bought the lot of them. Once we got them home to sort through and count them, we realized we had paid 3 cents per comic. With such a large (for us) inventory, we decided to start our own comic-book business, renting tables at monthly conventions in Boston to sell books -- which also allowed us to work on adding to our own collections. It was a blast for a couple of teenagers and made us feel like big shots.
    The smaller comic book shows in those days -- like the ones we attended every month in Boston -- were all about back issues. Once in a while, they would have a guest artist show up to sign autographs and/or sketch head shots of superheroes for fans on a piece of note paper, using a black sharpie. Mostly, however, everyone was there to leaf through long boxes of bagged comics, trying to fill holes in our runs of Spider-Mans or Fantastic Fours . . . and looking longingly at the high-priced older books, bagged and boarded, taped to the wall behind the dealers. Those were always out of reach, both literally and figuratively.
    Of course, the major comic book dealers took out classified ads in the comics themselves. You would write to them and request their for-sale lists -- which generally featured a price for every Marvel comic book ever published to that point. I remember being 12 years old, receiving a list in the mail from Robert Bell or Howard Rogofsky and being amazed that someone out there actually had all of these back issues. Again, the early Marvels were always out of my price range, but I always thought, "Some day!" Imagine me, owning a Daredevil 1? Or a Fantastic Four 3? Or even my holy grail, an Avengers 1?
    In the 1970's and early 1980's, "The Buyer's Guide for Comics Fandom" ruled the day. TBG, as it was called, was in newspaper format and came out weekly. I remember receiving my copy in the mail every Wednesday. There were articles and news items, of course -- Don and Maggie Thompson's "Beautiful Balloons," Cat Yronwode's "Fit to Print," columns by Terry Beatty, Mark Evanier and others. Great stuff. But the bulk of the content was comprised of ads. Display ads, classified ads, almost all of it "compose your own." Any collector or dealer would type out -- on a typewriter! -- a list of comics for sale, with prices, on an 8 ½" x 11" sheet of paper, and TBG would feature the list as a display ad, "as is." Each Wednesday, I'd scour the ads, looking for the comics I needed in nice condition.
    As I got a little older -- 16, 17 years old -- I was working part-time after school and I had a little more money to spend on comics (and other things). Around that time, the Overstreet Price Guide listed Avengers 1 being worth somewhere north of $100.00 in near mint condition. Of course, that was only if you could find someone willing to sell. In those days, I was checking every ad, believe me, week after week, for months and years, I had no success . . . until a certain Wednesday in 1979.
    I won't forget it. I came home after school -- or more likely, after cross-country practice after school -- and saw a quarter-page display ad in TBG advertising an Avengers 1 "in near mint condition, except for a ½" tear in the front cover," for $105.00. Hmmm. I had no experience with comic-book restoration at that point, but I did know that Bill Sarill was one of the leading experts -- if not the leading expert -- on comic book restoration. He was the owner and founder of "The Restoration Lab," and was based in Massachusetts. Maybe I'll buy the book and have the tear repaired locally at some point in the future? I decided not to wait any longer. If the small tear was truly the only thing wrong with the book, I'd finally have a near-mint looking Avengers 1 in my collection, after it had been out of my reach for so long. By that time, I could afford the $105.00. I mailed a check to the person placing the ad.
    Please realize, there was no FedEx, no UPS, no overnight or priority mail in those days. We had more patience then, because we had no other choice! So a couple of weeks passed and my Avengers 1 arrived in the mail. The advertiser was truthful, in my opinion. The book looked beautiful, except on the right side of the front cover, near Thor's belt, there was about a ½" tear, where someone reading the book had obviously (and mistakenly) torn the cover in their haste to open to the first page. How could I blame them? This was an Avengers 1, after all! To top it off, when you opened to the first page, there was a Jack Kirby autograph right at the top! This is not something that the owner had mentioned in the TBG ad, but I was delighted to discover it. This was a special book indeed.
    Flash forward over a decade. I went off to college. I spent a summer in California. I taught high school for a year in Pittsburgh, and then came back to Boston for law school. After graduating in 1989, I began my legal career. All the while, my comics -- including that old Avengers 1, with the slight tear in the cover -- remained at my parent's house. I made sure they were safely stored in a closet, bagged in mylar and acid-free boards. But like many of us, I had moved on to other interests, including girls, in my 20's. There was not a lot of room in my life for comics. It was probably a good idea not to have them around my apartment in those days, anyway.
    Around 1992 or 1993, Frank Miller's Sin City brought me back to comics. I started checking out comics stores semi-regularly and following a few books regularly. I began to think again about my Avengers #1, with the slight tear.
    I did a little research and learned that Susan Cicconi, who had been Bill Sarill's longtime apprentice, had bought The Restoration Lab from him. By all accounts, she was now one of the leading experts on comic book preservation and restoration. And she was still local. So I called her, arranged for an appointment, and took my Avengers 1 to her apartment, which contained her "lab," in which she did all her work. She checked out my Avengers 1 and told me that it was an excellent

    To see old comments for this Journal entry, click here. New comments can be added below.
  2. CardiacKid1
    or . . . How I came to love the UPC
    Disclaimer: This journal won't be for everyone. I fully realize that what I am about to discuss here has nothing to do with how good or bad any particular comic book is. In fact, this discussion has nothing to do with the content of any comic at all. I realize that I am about to make an argument about a topic that most collectors won't care about -- and which will probably be seen by most as superficial and silly. Of course, let's admit that we all have our quirks in collecting. So maybe my peculiar quirk here ends up making you feel a little less quirky and a little more normal. If that turns out to be the case, well, I'm glad to be of service. But just know in advance that I fully realize how ridiculous this is. With that said, let's get right to it.
     
    Newsstand Editions. At the outset, let's please stop calling them "variants;" or "newsstand variants." I say this will a little bit of a chip on my shoulder, in light of my preferences here, but please realize that before the direct-sales editions existed, the only editions published were newsstand editions. That Amazing Fantasy 15 worth tens of thousands of dollars? That's a newsstand edition. Detective 27? Newsstand. Everything prior to 1979, from every comics company (except Whitman, which I will discuss in a few moments) in existence? All newsstand editions. I was around, in full collecting mode, when the direct-sales editions were born and I didn't like them from the start. I never bought one . . . and still won't. In my mind, the direct-sales editions are the "variants."
    So let me take you back to 1979, when these direct editions invaded the comics collecting world. I am going to discuss the newsstand-vs.-direct-edition war in the context on my favorite run at the time . . . which is still my favorite run today: Frank Miller Daredevils. This is a good set to use, because DD 158 was the last issue of DD before the direct-edition invasion. The cover of 158 has that "still only 35 cents" blurb in the upper left-hand corner of the cover. And it had the box with the UPC code on the lower left.
    Ah, the UPC box. That's partly what this is about. We collectors tend to like uniformity in our collections. Most people reading this journal right now collect CGC comics, which means most -- if not all -- of of us have collections which fit neatly inside holders of identical size, inside boxes built for them, stacked somewhere in a room or closet. There's something appealing about that. We can compare one comic to the next -- whether for condition, design or whatever -- in a one-to-one comparison. When we get a comic in a larger or smaller format, we don't really know what to do with it, right? It doesn't quite seem to "fit" into our collection -- both literally and figuratively. It's a little bothersome. Admit it.
    Mind you, I didn't like the UPC box when they first started putting them on comics. On Daredevils, that bothersome box first arrived on the cover of issue 130, in early 1976. I remember thinking at the time that it was a dumb idea, because they were covering up the cover art for no good reason with something boring and unsightly. I formed this opinion with my teen-aged sensibility, of course. It took a few years, but in time, I got used to the UPC. After a while, in fact, I began to not even notice it. Nowadays, we're used to seeing them all over the place on just about everything we buy. Well, that started happening in the 1970's. I know that because I remember the era through the comics I was buying. But I digress.
    Let's get back to the issue of uniformity of format, and its desirability to collectors. The UPC box was something that every comic featured in the mid-to-late 70's. Starting with DD 159, however, two different-looking editions were published. The newsstand edition looked like the previous thirty or so Daredevils that came before it. The direct-sales edition sort of looked like them . . . except the UPC box had a diagonal black line through it. If the UPC box was boring and unsightly before, the UPC box, crossed out, was both ugly and more distracting. I decided, upon seeing both, that I would stick with newsstand editions. It wasn't even a close call.
    The crossed-out UPC box stuck around on direct-sales editions for about eight months. Daredevil was published bi-monthly in those days, so that meant issues 159 through 162 had that ugly and distracting, crossed out code in the rectangular box.
    Starting with DD 163, something even worse was put in the box: Spider-Man's masked face. Ugh. Okay, at least it was a piece of "art," rather than something that looked like a mistake that a teacher had corrected on the cover. But if you were a Daredevil fan in those days, having Spidey on all of your DD covers was more maddening. The only analogy that comes to mind is an appropriate one for me, as a lifelong Red Sox fan. Today, the Red Sox are one of the premier franchises in all of baseball. The Sox have won more World Series in this century than any other team. They've got great owners, great management, winning players and a terrific farm system. For most of my life, however, they always played second fiddle to the Yankees . . . and they always lost to the Yankees (and to everyone else!) when it really mattered most. That obviously gave a Red Sox fan a chip on his shoulder when it came to the mere mention of the NY Yankees. You couldn't bring up the Red Sox in those days without also bringing up their rivalry and inferiority to the Yankees.
    So it was with Spider-Man and Daredevil. Today, mainly as a result of Frank Miller, Daredevil is a popular and top-tier character. Back when I was collecting DD comics as a teenager, however, Daredevil was always thought of as a poor-man's Spider-Man. It seemed as though DD was always on the verge of cancellation. I was collecting DD's when his circulation was downgraded from monthly to bi-monthly. At the same time, Spider-Man was all over the place -- in his own title, in Marvel Team-up every month, in Marvel Tales reprints, on TV. Well, I liked Spidey as much as the next guy, but I felt a stronger connection to Daredevil (for reasons that I'll probably discuss in another journal) and I didn't like Spidey invading the cover. After all, Spider-Man was featured prominently on the very first DD ever published! In my mind -- with a Red-Sox-sized chip on my shoulder, Frank Miller's Daredevils should stand on their own! Now I have to look at Spidey's masked face on every issue going forward?
    Not if I kept buying newsstand editions! Over time, esthetically, the clean (and not crossed-out) UPC code was no longer boring and unsightly. It became appealing. It carried on the uniform tradition from prior issues and focused more attention on the terrific Frank Miller covers. The Spidey face in the direct-sales box instead reminded us all that Spidey is a better and more popular character.
    And we haven't even talked about the price box in the upper left-hand corner. To give you a little background here, that black diamond-shaped price box existed prior to direct-sales editions. In the '70's, you could walk into a Walgreens or some other drug store and purchase a plast
    To see old comments for this Journal entry, click here. New comments can be added below.