• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

EdMann2

Member
  • Posts

    73
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by EdMann2

  1. BA773 - I know you have a preference for DC (as do I) and if you want to have these to read, as well as collect, and you think it is a great deal, then you are in for a treat!  The first issue of JLA I ever got, coincidentally, was 95, and I fell in love with it as a kid!  I started buying it monthly around issue 168 to 250 or so, when I graduated high school and left for college and stopped buying new comics for several years.  In those 7 or 8 years I bought every back issue back to 45 or so...  And eventually was able to complete the entire series 15 or 20 years ago.

    So, obviously, I am a little biased when it comes to 70s-80's Justice League of America - and I know that's not going to be the majority opinion around here.

    But again - if you are looking to read and enjoy these, and not worry more about condition and flipping and "keys", you have a lot of good times ahead - the re-introduction of the Seven Soldiers of Victory, and old Quality and Fawcett heroes as part of several annul JLA/JSA team-up.  And all the great gold and silver age story reprints in the early 70s 52 page and 100 Page Super Spectacular issues!  And once you hit the early 80's there are a lot of great covers by George Perez and Brian Bolland.  They're not all great - of course - there's lots of good reading and good times in those books!  Or at least I thought so from the ages of 10-17 or so.  :bigsmile:

     

  2. On 9/16/2023 at 4:50 PM, Susanville said:

    The mis-cut drives me a little crazy but still love this cover. Plus a drug story.

    780A8AC4-C4CC-48B0-B2C4-541870496309_1_2

    I just read this issue recently, and I didn't remember any 'drug story'.  I checked it again, and sure enough, the word 'opium' is mentioned once near the end of one story.  It's funny to me that the notation would be 'Drug Story' for a tale that's not really about drugs, but IS about a killer 'Orang-utan' (sic) and has this as the first panel!

    image.thumb.png.04493408c4e63b560c6fdd6300bc3291.png

     

  3. I did a check through the first few issues of Nugget this afternoon, and the only one I could find with Baker art was Vol. 1 # 1 (November 1955).  There are at least three illustrations by him in there - including one for a story called "Swamp Fever"....  I checked all the other issues up through Vol. 2 # 2 (March 1957) and didn't see any more of his work.

  4. On 5/19/2023 at 4:04 PM, Robot Man said:

    A couple very early Avons hit my mailbox today. A wonderful title with art by the illustration artist Harrison Cady. Such fun stuff. Down to one issue to complete the Cady run.

    Happy to get these! 

    IMG_6570.jpeg

    IMG_6569.jpeg

    ...and I was the one you outbid on both of those, dang it!   Congrats - glad they went to a good home (besides mine)!

  5. On 3/9/2023 at 11:03 AM, aardvark88 said:

    But why is a '45' smaller than a '33' LP? Not logical to millennials.

    The names are very logical - because they are not describing the size but the speed at which they are played.  '45' and '33' (actually 33 1/3) refer to the RPM (Revolutions per Minute) of the turntable for playing each type of disc.  Typically, LPs ('long-playing' records) are '33' and singles/7" records are '45' (but, just to make it fun - not always).  And let's not even get started on 78s, which are usually an older format than either of these, but the size is in between the other two formats (10", vs. 12" or 7") and they spin faster than either!

     

  6. On 8/8/2022 at 7:11 PM, Half-Gringo said:

    Digging in "other than hero" boxes is always fun! 

     

    PXL_20220808_224326180.jpg

    Congrats!  That's a tough one to find, and one I have been trying to track down for several years now!  It always pays to check out those "Misc" or "Other" or "Various" sections at cons/shows/etc. - I have a found a lot of good, unexpected comics that way too!

  7. On 7/29/2022 at 8:08 PM, shadroch said:

    I would give most Kirby-Lee FFs an A or better.  I'm not sure the Challengers would rate a B and most of the other stories might be C+ material.  A lot of the Kirby art seems uninspired, like he was mailing them in.  I hadn't seen much of the Ditko stuff before and I enjoyed some of it.  The funny thing is if I were to have a thread about just how vital Stan was to Marvel, I'd be posting the very same stories.

    This comment just seems ridiculous to me....  A lot of Kirby's art seems "uninspired"?  Just look at the partial splash pages for each of the four parts of the story right above your comment - those seem VERY inspired to me, especially considering a lot of the comics coming out at the same time.  I don't know, man - seems to me you are trying too hard to discount Kirby.  Looking at those pages above it seems to me that Kirby was doing exciting, dynamic stories and art.  Plus, also unique for this time (at least for the comics I have read) the story fills a full issue, broken into chapters.  I don't know how many comics were structured that way at them time.  And the pacing is similar to Fantastic Four #1 a few years later.  Was Stan Lee doing any stories like this - or even close - at this time, or any time previous to this?  And you can argue that someone else "wrote" this story - but certainly Kirby was at least responsible for the pacing and structure and look of it...  Mailing it in?  You comment seems based on opinion, and in MY opinion, I disagree.

  8. To be fair, this Matt Baker story was a retitled reprint from Teen-Age Romances #6 from 1949, when he was still getting his feet wet in romance comics.  I think his interior art definitely improved later - more interesting layouts, better body language and facial expressions, etc.  One of my favorites is from TAR #37, "Thrill Seekers' Weekend" from 1954.

    By the way - I've been loving these write-ups!  The month-by-month approach is really interesting, and the years 1954-55 are right in my collecting wheelhouse!  I'm not sure how long you plan to keep going, but your efforts are definitely appreciated by this reader....