-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
-
Posts
126 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
MAR1979 reacted to a post in a topic: A Dealer's Pricing
-
June 2023 Heritage Signature Auction #7340
otherworldsj331 replied to grapeape's topic in Original Comic Art
I have been saying for over a year that the price declines are coming. They will continue. The economy is in dire shape. Inflation is far from licked and in fact will increase to record numbers next year. People are hurting in this economy. -
June 2023 Heritage Signature Auction #7340
otherworldsj331 replied to grapeape's topic in Original Comic Art
As long as interest rates are below a certain threshold, we will not see those rates again. -
Readcomix reacted to a post in a topic: Steve Rude Twice Up Size B & W Recreation of 1950's Girls Love Stories #13 cover.
-
BCarter27 reacted to a post in a topic: Steve Rude Twice Up Size B & W Recreation of 1950's Girls Love Stories #13 cover.
-
Point Five reacted to a post in a topic: Steve Rude Twice Up Size B & W Recreation of 1950's Girls Love Stories #13 cover.
-
gumbydarnit reacted to a post in a topic: John Romita Sr has passed away at 93
-
Garf reacted to a post in a topic: John Romita Sr has passed away at 93
-
grapeape reacted to a post in a topic: John Romita Sr has passed away at 93
-
John Romita Sr has passed away at 93
otherworldsj331 replied to Brian Peck's topic in Original Comic Art
I had dinner with him and his son and their wives in 1998 at a San Diego comic con. He was so pleasant, such a beautiful soul. -
Larryw7 reacted to a post in a topic: Dark Mysteries #19 vs. #10 | Poll: 12 to 11
-
Can anyone tell me if they understand Section 230? If not here, goes - "Section 230 is a section of Title 47 of the United States Code enacted as part of the United States Communications Decency Act, that generally provides immunity for website platforms with respect to third-party content. At its core, Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by third-party users: Pardon my capital letters, but many of you are so uneducated about this or misinformed I need to stress this point. ONCE A THIRD-PARTY PROVIDER CENSURES PEOPLE THEY CEASE TO BECOME MERELY PROVIDERS AND BECOME PUBLISHING EDITORS. Think about that for a second and let it sink in, and stop with your third grade parroting of something you heard once or twice, never researched, and are simply regurgitating. Furthermore, as I previously said, but some of you are ignoring, the social media companies it can be strongly argued in a court of law, are DeFacto public squares and as such can possibly be liable to the first amendment. Is this clear enough for you all supporters of censorship? So before you make comments that are clearly questionable, realize this issue is not decided and probably ultimately will be in the courts or (in a pro Constitutional) congress
-
You got those on Comic Link?