• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Washtone / Greytone Covers -- All of them in one place. . .time to weigh in

151 posts in this topic

I just saw this thread now. How would you classify this book?

 

230_zpsa9e2a2d8.jpg

 

Washtone!

Beautiful copy, too.

 

I'd agree to calling it a washtone/greytone. What a great cover!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Tales of the Unexpected 15 is one of my all time favorite DC SA covers, washtone or not. On another note, I once owned the original art cover to HOM 92, and as great as the published comic looked, it looked awesome. Sometimes I wish I had never traded it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure this was posted earlier but is one of my favorites. Washtone?

 

I paid too much for it at a live auction. Bidding war against one other but it was part of the Henschel OO collection and loved the cover.

 

Gripes. I just realized we are in Silver and this is a Gold. I can delete if need be. Sorry.

 

1201131826011.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's still an awesome cover and I want to know if people think it's a washtone?

 

And I want Andy to run a "best of washtone" cover contest!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure this was posted earlier but is one of my favorites. Washtone?

 

I paid too much for it at a live auction. Bidding war against one other but it was part of the Henschel OO collection and loved the cover.

 

Gripes. I just realized we are in Silver and this is a Gold. I can delete if need be. Sorry.

 

1201131826011.jpg

 

wow awesome !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm reposting this now that there are a number of participants. I love all the posts with books but I want to have everybody weigh in on the following:

 

Hi folks,

Friday night, stress at work, need for catharsis. Maybe it's time to revive this thread.

 

I had some thoughts as I was reviewing so many of the posts.

 

What do you think of this:

 

We vote them INTO or OUT OF 3 categories:

 

1. Calling it a washtone (if it has the wash tone non-inked-line EFFECT regardless of era, method, or process including wash, watercolor, gouache, charcoal, color blends or gradation, etc.) if it's more than 50% of the cover.

 

2. Calling it a partial washtone (using the above criteria--pivotal word being EFFECT) if it's less than 50% of the cover.

 

3. NOT calling it a washtone if it doesn't have the washtone EFFECT.

 

 

Using the criteria above, I can easily see us going with a majority vote for the following that would have a washtone EFFECT (thus qualifying as "washtone" even if it's not technically achieved by that method). These are just EXAMPLES of how I'm imagining the vote would go:

 

A. Washtones: GIC 69, 75, 83, HOM 92, Three Mouseketeers 6, Sea Devils 10, My Greatest Adventure 17, Peter Panda 30

 

 

B. Partial washtones: Secret Hearts 59, Date with Judy , Challengers of the Unknown 30

 

 

C. NOT wash tones: House of Secrets 1, My Greatest Adventure 18 and 20, House of Mystery 70, Star Spangled War Stories 80

 

Again, those are just examples. I think if we vote on those three categories, we don't need to have such a narrow definition of washtone and WE (that's us, baby) get to decide what's in and what's out by the vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's still an awesome cover and I want to know if people think it's a washtone?

 

And I want Andy to run a "best of washtone" cover contest!

 

....yes, yes...... although there are probably 3 dozen that I just couldn't choose one or the other. My feeble human mind has trouble processing stuff of this magnitude in such a temporal quantitative fashion..... it's just too primitive. It's like "which cave is the best?" ...... "....the dry one!" lol:cloud9: GOD BLESS....

 

-jimbo(a friend of jesus) (thumbs u

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

Friday night, stress at work, need for catharsis. Maybe it's time to revive this thread.

 

I had some thoughts as I was reviewing so many of the posts.

 

What do you think of this:

 

We vote them INTO or OUT OF 3 categories:

 

1. Calling it a washtone (if it has the wash tone non-inked-line EFFECT regardless of era, method, or process including wash, watercolor, gouache, charcoal, color blends or gradation, etc.) if it's more than 50% of the cover.

 

2. Calling it a partial washtone (using the above criteria--pivotal word being EFFECT) if it's less than 50% of the cover.

 

3. NOT calling it a washtone if it doesn't have the washtone EFFECT.

 

 

Using the criteria above, I can easily see us going with a majority vote for the following that would have a washtone EFFECT (thus qualifying as "washtone" even if it's not technically achieved by that method). These are just EXAMPLES of how I'm imagining the vote would go:

 

A. Washtones: GIC 69, 75, 83, HOM 92, Three Mouseketeers 6, Sea Devils 10, My Greatest Adventure 17, Peter Panda 30

 

 

B. Partial washtones: Secret Hearts 59, Date with Judy , Challengers of the Unknown 30

 

 

C. NOT wash tones: House of Secrets 1, My Greatest Adventure 18 and 20, House of Mystery 70, Star Spangled War Stories 80

 

Again, those are just examples. I think if we vote on those three categories, we don't need to have such a narrow definition of washtone and WE (that's us, baby) get to decide what's in and what's out by the vote.

 

I'm in for this method. But here's a thought: should this be limited to Atom/Silver Age DC, just for the sake of keeping this manageable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites