Nominating RICK STARR
10 10

295 posts in this topic

Is this the guy who voted No on Shoo bc of hope?

People have posted exponentially more to defend the seller than he has himself. Instead of speaking for him, let him speak for himself. And if he chooses not to, that’s how much he cares about his reputation, so why expend effort on his behalf?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, manetteska said:

Is this the guy who voted No on Shoo bc of hope?

People have posted exponentially more to defend the seller than he has himself. Instead of speaking for him, let him speak for himself. And if he chooses not to, that’s how much he cares about his reputation, so why expend effort on his behalf?

Denzel My Man GIFs | Tenor

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, manetteska said:

Is this the guy who voted No on Shoo bc of hope?

If you're referring to me, my only post in that thread was 'Freddie Starr ate my Hamster'. Look it up on the thread.

And the word Starr is pure coincidence with this thread I hasten to add.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Callaway29 said:

Just because the majority is on the opposing side of you doesn’t make the opposing side a mob.

I totally agree, but the behaviour of some individuals has been immature, purile and downright beneath the standards of what I would expect from some here. It beggars belief how the mods can bring down the hammer for the most trivial of reasons but choose to ignore certain despicable behaviours because no-one mentions a certain taboo subject. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, G G ® said:

I totally agree, but the behaviour of some individuals has been immature, purile and downright beneath the standards of what I would expect from some here. It beggars belief how the mods can bring down the hammer for the most trivial of reasons but choose to ignore certain despicable behaviours because no-one mentions a certain taboo subject. 

Do you have examples of this purile behavior? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And yes you lot (not all of you) are acting like a pack of wolves. A howling mob baying for blood. An insatiable lust for your perceived justice that must be satiated,

I'm not the person that coined the 'mob mentality' in this thread. Read thru 'it. But I agree with the sentiment. You guys really need to take a look at yourselves. With that I wish you a goodnight and happy witch burning. :insane:

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, G G ® said:

And yes you lot (not all of you) are acting like a pack of wolves. A howling mob baying for blood. An insatiable lust for your perceived justice that must be satiated,

I'm not the person that coined the 'mob mentality' in this thread. Read thru 'it. But I agree with the sentiment. You guys really need to take a look at yourselves. With that I wish you a goodnight and happy witch burning. :insane:

Does this mean no examples?

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, manetteska said:

Is this the guy who voted No on Shoo bc of hope?

People have posted exponentially more to defend the seller than he has himself. Instead of speaking for him, let him speak for himself. And if he chooses not to, that’s how much he cares about his reputation, so why expend effort on his behalf?

That was Wilbil - he went through great lengths to explain why. 

Edited by Buzzetta
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/28/2020 at 3:19 PM, BuscemasAvengers said:

Agreed B ... just would be funny if the check showed up (that would seem to eliminate the 'timely payment' debate because it was not in the control of the buyer).  And he did offer other options to pay.  Seems to point to remorse for me, and I find the incident having intriguing parallels to the 'agamoto incident' last week.

If the seller does have seller’s remorse,  maybe he did receive the check and destroy it and claim he never received it? I don’t think the buyer sent it registered so there is no way to know if the seller received it or not other than his word, which at this point isn’t looking too good.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Buzzetta said:
35 minutes ago, manetteska said:

Is this the guy who voted No on Shoo bc of hope?

People have posted exponentially more to defend the seller than he has himself. Instead of speaking for him, let him speak for himself. And if he chooses not to, that’s how much he cares about his reputation, so why expend effort on his behalf?

That was Wilbil - he went through great lengths to explain why. 

I know. I was just getting serious contrarian / “not getting it” deja vu. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, manetteska said:

I know. I was just getting serious contrarian / “not getting it” deja vu. 

Oopsie 

Side note... anyone know a good contractor along the South Shore of Long Island... I really wanted to get this done... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem I am having with the seller is the sort of lackadaisical attitude about receiving the check.  "Havent checked the mail today"  "The mail is slow lets give it more time" type posts and then suddenly out of the blue "I've decided to keep the book".  Not "I have waited and waited and keep checking the mail and no check I need payment by X or I am going to relist the book for sale".
That's the problem I'm having along with the "this will be my one and only post on the subject".  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
10 10