• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Baker Romance
43 43

13,400 posts in this topic

21 hours ago, Electricmastro said:

apparently didn’t draw any covers for Fiction House

"Apparently"?  Some of those Jumbos look like his work.  I don't collect Fiction House (except Planet), so I can't really say...  BUT, I think you are mistaken.  Just a brief glance on GCD's gallery of Jumbo I see #85....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Yorick said:

"Apparently"?  Some of those Jumbos look like his work.  I don't collect Fiction House (except Planet), so I can't really say...  BUT, I think you are mistaken.  Just a brief glance on GCD's gallery of Jumbo I see #85....

It’s weird, because a lot of Fiction House’s covers end up looking the same, or at least very similar, to me. That being said, and now that you brought it to my attention, I’m definitely willing to believe this is a Matt Baker cover:

gKt8K5n.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Electricmastro said:

It’s weird, because a lot of Fiction House’s covers end up looking the same, or at least very similar, to me. That being said, and now that you brought it to my attention, I’m definitely willing to believe this is a Matt Baker cover:

gKt8K5n.jpg

I think this is not ENTIRELY Baker.  Definitely the woman's face, but other elements might be Doolin.   All these collaborative efforts by Baker are what makes the debate!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Yorick said:

I think this is not ENTIRELY Baker.  Definitely the woman's face, but other elements might be Doolin.   All these collaborative efforts by Baker are what makes the debate!!

It was pointed out to me that a helpful way to identify uncredited Golden Age comic art is by looking at the ears, because the ear is a relatively detailed part of the body that’s usually visible, assuming the character isn’t wearing anything like a hat or doesn’t have long hair covering it. I’ve found that many artists had their own way of drawing the ear, specifically the antihelix, which is often distinct like a sort of signature in of itself, and while even the same artist doesn’t draw the ear in exactly the same way every time, it’s usually consistent enough to provide a reasonably and confidently-made identification.

Matt Baker’s signed covers from 1946-1949:

JNzGLEO.jpg

5mPPhM8.jpg

Oszwom8.jpg

e3YcayD.jpg

YiB0rjf.jpg

bc34Do4.jpg

DFBZYSm.jpg

mtjCHGd.jpg

Going by these, Baker seems to approach drawing the ears in a sort of “?” shaped pattern without the period, which at times also resembles a little more like an “S” or “7”, depending on how far away the ear is and what angle it’s being viewed from:

RIcQZxN.jpg

In comparing the images to Jumbo Comics #85 (1946), I am now seeing more of a resemblance that’s consistent, along with how the entire faces of the women are drawn in general:

CZpFmps.jpg

So upon further examination, Baker may have done far more covers than I previously realized, if only in part.

Edited by Electricmastro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Yorick said:

I think this is not ENTIRELY Baker.  Definitely the woman's face, but other elements might be Doolin.   All these collaborative efforts by Baker are what makes the debate!!

Baker came in and changed faces,  and that's an example. OSPG will never call it a Baker cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Yorick said:

I think this is not ENTIRELY Baker.  Definitely the woman's face, but other elements might be Doolin.   All these collaborative efforts by Baker are what makes the debate!!

Joe Doolin would also be a likely candidate in regards to the majority of the cover. To differentiate him from Baker, I’ve noticed that Doolin tended to draw shaded faces with wide-eyed/bulging eyes and ears having a black circle in the middle with a line curving around it in the shape of a “C”. He also went as so far as to draw the iris in the eye, whereas Baker basically tended to have a black circle with a white dot in the middle to represent the eye.

bDPNolP.jpg

l7GecFm.jpg

VhXCxXF.jpg

U3J2zBM.jpg

RPihrR4.jpg

m15nMBn.jpg

Edited by Electricmastro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Electricmastro said:

looking at the ears

I like to look at those gams!!!  Look at your edited face-set of eight.  All the eyes and lips are his "style" as well.

When we're dealing with other hands on the artwork, it is the proportions of the figures that give me something to work with in identifying underlying Baker pencils.

I also think it's different for different artists.  If you see a hallmark with the ears, great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
43 43