PGM x-men 94 0

[ernieherring]

I don't think I over payed for it, but curious as to what you guys think. I thank you in advance!

[ernieherring]

[maraxusofkeld]

Pics are touch to see, but I want to say 7.5. A press would definitely help on this book.

[apollobuzz]

7.0.  But lower if that is moisture stain on top of back cover.

[ernieherring]

Thanks guys, thats what i thought it would be 6.5 low scale , 8 on a high scale. I got it for 455 off ebay; seller said it was 7.5 or 8. Which obvious means i got a helluva deal. He packed it like and I believe he did it because he knew I won a great price and was bitter.... needless to say those stress marks on the top left was where the cardboard "supporters" was slightly bent. Im in the process of finding a good presser where i live...(dc area) and will be sending a couple to be pressed and graded here soon.

[James J Johnson]

With regards to the spine and top spine corner area, from what I can see of it, and I wish I had as good a close up of the bottom half of the spine as I do of the top half, it's an 8.0 at best. Couple that with the right edge defect and we're in the 7.0 area, again at best. The stain is going to impact that, so although it presents much nicer than the typical 6.0, IMO, that's about where the CGC cookie will crumble on this one.

Edited March 12, 2018 by James J Johnson

[c_mkv]

This is a really nice looking 7.0.