Thor 337 ... Help identify the source of the damage.
1 1

24 posts in this topic

54 posts
Posted (edited)

Hey boardies...

 

Received this book a couple weeks ago, I noticed the damage once it arrived ... After it arrived, I reviewed the pics on eBay saw that it was visible there as well. I didn't notice it when I purchased it, so it's my own fault in the end. I'm wondering if this was caused during encapsulation or is a result of something else like SCS?  If it happened during encapsulation (pretty sure it wasn't but a guy can hope) was it equated into the grade? 

Thanks

IMG_20190630_181954463_HDR.jpg

IMG_20190630_182008825.jpg

Edited by Lurker89

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47,664 posts

It looks like ink printing defect as if it was a scrape you would see it thru the R.  Or maybe my eyes just cant see it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8,932 posts
5 minutes ago, kav said:

It looks like ink printing defect as if it was a scrape you would see it thru the R.  Or maybe my eyes just cant see it?

The page has some over hang... slight tear in the over hang by the rrrrrr matey!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8,932 posts
Just now, ADAMANTIUM said:

The page has some over hang... slight tear in the over hang by the rrrrrr matey!

I don't believe that it was done in encapsulation... otherwise there'd be no tear

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47,664 posts
6 minutes ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

The page has some over hang... slight tear in the over hang by the rrrrrr matey!

Oh I see it now!! thx brody!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 posts
2 minutes ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

I don't believe that it was done in encapsulation... otherwise there'd be no tear

Yeah my concern was the tear... The printing error doesn't bother me but that tear eats at the OCD. 

Are you saying in your opinion the tear was there before it was encapsulated?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47,664 posts
6 minutes ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

I don't believe that it was done in encapsulation... otherwise there'd be no tear

This was most likely caused by something or other-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,959 posts
Posted (edited)

Problems I noticed in the front scan only.  

Nice book, but had some defects.  :foryou:

AC379F26-D06E-4432-833E-3DAE41A37DA7.jpeg

Edited by nepatkm
Defects

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8,932 posts
55 minutes ago, Lurker89 said:

Yeah my concern was the tear... The printing error doesn't bother me but that tear eats at the OCD. 

Are you saying in your opinion the tear was there before it was encapsulated?

I'm not positive but it's in line with the other defects for 8.5... just imo

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,812 posts
11 minutes ago, nepatkm said:

Problems I noticed in the front scan only.  

Nice book, but had some defects.  :foryou:

AC379F26-D06E-4432-833E-3DAE41A37DA7.jpeg

Wow that was thorough.  You need to find your calling at CGC. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,959 posts
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, THE_BEYONDER said:

Looks like the right edge overhang suffered SCS to me.(shrug)

Staples seem to be intact, unless it was tapped back down?  

Other defects that would drop it to at least an 8.0-9.0 ( from front scan only) in my opinion without the overhang problem. Still a nice presenting book. (thumbsu

Edited by nepatkm
Front scan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39,518 posts
10 minutes ago, nepatkm said:

Staples seem to be intact, unless it was tapped back down?  

Other defects that would drop it to at least an 8.0-9.0 ( from front scan only) in my opinion without the overhang problem. Still a nice presenting book. (thumbsu

There won’t be any staple issues if the whole book shifted.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,959 posts
19 minutes ago, THE_BEYONDER said:

There won’t be any staple issues if the whole book shifted.

 

 

 

 

To much space between the encapsulated area for just a book shift, and yes the staples would pull at that point. 😔

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47,664 posts
1 hour ago, nepatkm said:

Problems I noticed in the front scan only.  

Nice book, but had some defects.  :foryou:

AC379F26-D06E-4432-833E-3DAE41A37DA7.jpeg

Stay out of grading contest!!!:pullhair:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,959 posts
20 minutes ago, kav said:

Stay out of grading contest!!!:pullhair:

I do....:sorry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47,664 posts
5 minutes ago, nepatkm said:

I do....:sorry:

:flipbait:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 posts
3 hours ago, nepatkm said:

Problems I noticed in the front scan only.  

Nice book, but had some defects.  :foryou:

AC379F26-D06E-4432-833E-3DAE41A37DA7.jpeg

Thanks, great work the detailed look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 posts
3 hours ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

I'm not positive but it's in line with the other defects for 8.5... just imo

 

Cool, wanted to verify it's in the right range for the grade.:takeit:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,263 posts
11 hours ago, nepatkm said:

Problems I noticed in the front scan only.  

Nice book, but had some defects.  :foryou:

AC379F26-D06E-4432-833E-3DAE41A37DA7.jpeg

Ah, yes, I see it. should just be a "VEL" comic. Rare printing defect. Nice eye!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
1 1